[NET]: Conditionally use bh_lock_sock_nested in sk_receive_skb

Spotted by Ian McDonald, tentatively fixed by Gerrit Renker:

http://www.mail-archive.com/dccp%40vger.kernel.org/msg00599.html

Rewritten not to unroll sk_receive_skb, in the common case, i.e. no lock
debugging, its optimized away.

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
index a20eb71d45db..7114befe7d50 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static int dccp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
                 goto discard_and_relse;
         nf_reset(skb);
 
-        return sk_receive_skb(sk, skb);
+        return sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, 1);
 
 no_dccp_socket:
         if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
index 6eda430ae929..03bb8298250a 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff **pskb)
         if (!xfrm6_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
                 goto discard_and_relse;
 
-        return sk_receive_skb(sk, skb) ? -1 : 0;
+        return sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, 1) ? -1 : 0;
 
 no_dccp_socket:
         if (!xfrm6_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))