[DCCP]: Use skb_set_owner_w in dccp_transmit_skb when skb->sk is NULL

David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> One thing you can probably do for this bug is to mark data packets
> explicitly somehow, perhaps in the SKB control block DCCP already
> uses for other data.  Put some boolean in there, set it true for
> data packets.  Then change the test in dccp_transmit_skb() as
> appropriate to test the boolean flag instead of "skb_cloned(skb)".

I agree.  In fact we already have that flag, it's called skb->sk.
So here is patch to test that instead of skb_cloned().

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Ian McDonald <imcdnzl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c
index 4786bdcddcc9..946ec2db75de 100644
--- a/net/dccp/output.c
+++ b/net/dccp/output.c
@@ -62,10 +62,8 @@ int dccp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
                 
                 skb->h.raw = skb_push(skb, dccp_header_size);
                 dh = dccp_hdr(skb);
-                /*
-                 * Data packets are not cloned as they are never retransmitted
-                 */
-                if (skb_cloned(skb))
+
+                if (!skb->sk)
                         skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk);
 
                 /* Build DCCP header and checksum it. */