bridge: add rcu_read_lock on transmit

Long ago, when bridge was converted to RCU, rcu lock was equivalent
to having preempt disabled. RCU has changed a lot since then and
bridge code was still assuming the since transmit was called with
bottom half disabled, it was RCU safe.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
index b01dde35a69e..7204ad3aff65 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ void br_fdb_delete_by_port(struct net_bridge *br,
         spin_unlock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
 }
 
-/* No locking or refcounting, assumes caller has no preempt (rcu_read_lock) */
+/* No locking or refcounting, assumes caller has rcu_read_lock */
 struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *__br_fdb_get(struct net_bridge *br,
                                           const unsigned char *addr)
 {