diff options
author | Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> | 2005-06-21 20:14:52 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> | 2005-06-21 21:46:16 -0400 |
commit | 73219d178051691a56d57184d8c7f6d0cbe3c5c1 (patch) | |
tree | c527691510f5a2b757eac424c5671704084fc9eb /mm | |
parent | 1363c3cd8603a913a27e2995dccbd70d5312d8e6 (diff) |
[PATCH] mmap topdown fix for large stack limit, large allocation
The topdown changes in 2.6.12-rc1 can cause large allocations with large
stack limit to fail, despite there being space available. The
mmap_base-len is only valid when len >= mmap_base. However, nothing in
topdown allocator checks this. It's only (now) caught at higher level,
which will cause allocation to simply fail. The following change restores
the fallback to bottom-up path, which will allow large allocations with
large stack limit to potentially still succeed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/mmap.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -1267,6 +1267,9 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0, | |||
1267 | return (mm->free_area_cache = addr-len); | 1267 | return (mm->free_area_cache = addr-len); |
1268 | } | 1268 | } |
1269 | 1269 | ||
1270 | if (mm->mmap_base < len) | ||
1271 | goto bottomup; | ||
1272 | |||
1270 | addr = mm->mmap_base-len; | 1273 | addr = mm->mmap_base-len; |
1271 | 1274 | ||
1272 | do { | 1275 | do { |
@@ -1288,6 +1291,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0, | |||
1288 | addr = vma->vm_start-len; | 1291 | addr = vma->vm_start-len; |
1289 | } while (len < vma->vm_start); | 1292 | } while (len < vma->vm_start); |
1290 | 1293 | ||
1294 | bottomup: | ||
1291 | /* | 1295 | /* |
1292 | * A failed mmap() very likely causes application failure, | 1296 | * A failed mmap() very likely causes application failure, |
1293 | * so fall back to the bottom-up function here. This scenario | 1297 | * so fall back to the bottom-up function here. This scenario |