[ARM] fix naming of MODULE_START / MODULE_END

As of 73bdf0a60e607f4b8ecc5aec597105976565a84f, the kernel needs
to know where modules are located in the virtual address space.
On ARM, we located this region between MODULE_START and MODULE_END.
Unfortunately, everyone else calls it MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END.
Update ARM to use the same naming, so is_vmalloc_or_module_addr()
can work properly.  Also update the comment on mm/vmalloc.c to
reflect that ARM also places modules in a separate region from the
vmalloc space.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index f1cc03bbf6ac..66fad3fc02b1 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int vmap_page_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 static inline int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
 {
         /*
-         * x86-64 and sparc64 put modules in a special place,
+         * ARM, x86-64 and sparc64 put modules in a special place,
          * and fall back on vmalloc() if that fails. Others
          * just put it in the vmalloc space.
          */