mm, x86: shrink_active_range() should check all

Now we are using register_e820_active_regions() instead of
add_active_range() directly. So end_pfn could be different between the
value in early_node_map to node_end_pfn.

So we need to make shrink_active_range() smarter.

shrink_active_range() is a generic MM function in mm/page_alloc.c but
it is only used on 32-bit x86. Should we move it back to some file in
arch/x86?

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 34 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 502223c3c2c6..215408684076 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3579,25 +3579,49 @@ void __init add_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
 /**
  * shrink_active_range - Shrink an existing registered range of PFNs
  * @nid: The node id the range is on that should be shrunk
- * @old_end_pfn: The old end PFN of the range
  * @new_end_pfn: The new PFN of the range
  *
  * i386 with NUMA use alloc_remap() to store a node_mem_map on a local node.
- * The map is kept at the end physical page range that has already been
- * registered with add_active_range(). This function allows an arch to shrink
- * an existing registered range.
+ * The map is kept near the end physical page range that has already been
+ * registered. This function allows an arch to shrink an existing registered
+ * range.
  */
-void __init shrink_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long old_end_pfn,
-                                                unsigned long new_end_pfn)
+void __init shrink_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long new_end_pfn)
 {
-        int i;
+        int i, j;
+        int removed = 0;
 
         /* Find the old active region end and shrink */
-        for_each_active_range_index_in_nid(i, nid)
-                if (early_node_map[i].end_pfn == old_end_pfn) {
+        for_each_active_range_index_in_nid(i, nid) {
+                if (early_node_map[i].start_pfn >= new_end_pfn) {
+                        /* clear it */
+                        early_node_map[i].end_pfn = 0;
+                        removed = 1;
+                        continue;
+                }
+                if (early_node_map[i].end_pfn > new_end_pfn) {
                         early_node_map[i].end_pfn = new_end_pfn;
-                        break;
+                        continue;
                 }
+        }
+
+        if (!removed)
+                return;
+
+        /* remove the blank ones */
+        for (i = nr_nodemap_entries - 1; i > 0; i--) {
+                if (early_node_map[i].nid != nid)
+                        continue;
+                if (early_node_map[i].end_pfn)
+                        continue;
+                /* we found it, get rid of it */
+                for (j = i; j < nr_nodemap_entries - 1; j++)
+                        memcpy(&early_node_map[j], &early_node_map[j+1],
+                                sizeof(early_node_map[j]));
+                j = nr_nodemap_entries - 1;
+                memset(&early_node_map[j], 0, sizeof(early_node_map[j]));
+                nr_nodemap_entries--;
+        }
 }
 
 /**