mm: remove gfp_mask from add_to_swap

Remove gfp_mask argument from add_to_swap(): it's misleading because its
only caller, shrink_page_list(), is not atomic at that point; and in due
course (implementing discard) we'll sometimes want to allocate some memory
with GFP_NOIO (as is used in swap_writepage) when allocating swap.

No change to the gfp_mask passed down to add_to_swap_cache(): still use
__GFP_HIGH without __GFP_WAIT (with nomemalloc and nowarn as before):
though it's not obvious if that's the best combination to ask for here.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 74f875733e2b..cc7401571cba 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
                 if (PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapCache(page)) {
                         if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
                                 goto keep_locked;
-                        if (!add_to_swap(page, GFP_ATOMIC))
+                        if (!add_to_swap(page))
                                 goto activate_locked;
                         may_enter_fs = 1;
                 }