Apply memory policies to top two highest zones when highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE

The NUMA layer only supports NUMA policies for the highest zone.  When
ZONE_MOVABLE is configured with kernelcore=, the the highest zone becomes
ZONE_MOVABLE.  The result is that policies are only applied to allocations
like anonymous pages and page cache allocated from ZONE_MOVABLE when the
zone is used.

This patch applies policies to the two highest zones when the highest zone
is ZONE_MOVABLE.  As ZONE_MOVABLE consists of pages from the highest "real"
zone, it's always functionally equivalent.

The patch has been tested on a variety of machines both NUMA and non-NUMA
covering x86, x86_64 and ppc64.  No abnormal results were seen in
kernbench, tbench, dbench or hackbench.  It passes regression tests from
the numactl package with and without kernelcore= once numactl tests are
patched to wait for vmstat counters to update.

akpm: this is the nasty hack to fix NUMA mempolicies in the presence of
ZONE_MOVABLE and kernelcore= in 2.6.23.  Christoph says "For .24 either merge
the mobility or get the other solution that Mel is working on.  That solution
would only use a single zonelist per node and filter on the fly.  That may
help performance and also help to make memory policies work better."

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Acked-by:  Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Tested-by:  Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 71b84b45154a..172abffeb2e3 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static struct zonelist *bind_zonelist(nodemask_t *nodes)
            lower zones etc. Avoid empty zones because the memory allocator
            doesn't like them. If you implement node hot removal you
            have to fix that. */
-        k = policy_zone;
+        k = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1;
         while (1) {
                 for_each_node_mask(nd, *nodes) { 
                         struct zone *z = &NODE_DATA(nd)->node_zones[k];