mm/memcg: replace inexistence move_lock_page_cgroup() by move_lock_mem_cgroup() in comment

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ac87e79b00d1..4f73c823c59f 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1898,7 +1898,7 @@ again:
                 return;
         /*
          * If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't
-         * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold
+         * need to take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). Because we already hold
          * rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until
          * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true.
          */
@@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(struct page *page, unsigned long *flags)
         /*
          * It's guaranteed that pc->mem_cgroup never changes while
          * lock is held because a routine modifies pc->mem_cgroup
-         * should take move_lock_page_cgroup().
+         * should take move_lock_mem_cgroup().
          */
         move_unlock_mem_cgroup(pc->mem_cgroup, flags);
 }