diff options
author | Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> | 2012-07-31 19:43:07 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-07-31 21:42:43 -0400 |
commit | 567fb435bb7a37afda35902b884562c40756dc45 (patch) | |
tree | 71c4cec3ab02bd69eafbfd98d38774466d52843e /mm/memcontrol.c | |
parent | ca28ddc908fcfef0e5c1b6e5df632db7fc26de10 (diff) |
memcg: fix bad behavior in use_hierarchy file
I have an application that does the following:
* copy the state of all controllers attached to a hierarchy
* replicate it as a child of the current level.
I would expect writes to the files to mostly succeed, since they are
inheriting sane values from parents.
But that is not the case for use_hierarchy. If it is set to 0, we succeed
ok. If we're set to 1, the value of the file is automatically set to 1 in
the children, but if userspace tries to write the very same 1, it will
fail. That same situation happens if we set use_hierarchy, create a
child, and then try to write 1 again.
Now, there is no reason whatsoever for failing to write a value that is
already there. It doesn't even match the comments, that states:
/* If parent's use_hierarchy is set, we can't make any modifications
* in the child subtrees...
since we are not changing anything.
So test the new value against the one we're storing, and automatically
return 0 if we're not proposing a change.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 55a85e1a342f..6d3dd54ec429 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c | |||
@@ -3764,6 +3764,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft, | |||
3764 | parent_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(parent); | 3764 | parent_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(parent); |
3765 | 3765 | ||
3766 | cgroup_lock(); | 3766 | cgroup_lock(); |
3767 | |||
3768 | if (memcg->use_hierarchy == val) | ||
3769 | goto out; | ||
3770 | |||
3767 | /* | 3771 | /* |
3768 | * If parent's use_hierarchy is set, we can't make any modifications | 3772 | * If parent's use_hierarchy is set, we can't make any modifications |
3769 | * in the child subtrees. If it is unset, then the change can | 3773 | * in the child subtrees. If it is unset, then the change can |
@@ -3780,6 +3784,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft, | |||
3780 | retval = -EBUSY; | 3784 | retval = -EBUSY; |
3781 | } else | 3785 | } else |
3782 | retval = -EINVAL; | 3786 | retval = -EINVAL; |
3787 | |||
3788 | out: | ||
3783 | cgroup_unlock(); | 3789 | cgroup_unlock(); |
3784 | 3790 | ||
3785 | return retval; | 3791 | return retval; |