vsprintf: make comment about vs{n,cn,}printf more understandable

"You probably want ... instead." sounds like a recommendation better
not to use the v... functions.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index d3023df8477f..bba9caa375d0 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -1301,8 +1301,7 @@ qualifier:
  * return is greater than or equal to @size, the resulting
  * string is truncated.
  *
- * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list.
- * You probably want snprintf() instead.
+ * If you're not already dealing with a va_list consider using snprintf().
  */
 int vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt, va_list args)
 {
@@ -1476,8 +1475,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vsnprintf);
  * the @buf not including the trailing '\0'. If @size is == 0 the function
  * returns 0.
  *
- * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list.
- * You probably want scnprintf() instead.
+ * If you're not already dealing with a va_list consider using scnprintf().
  *
  * See the vsnprintf() documentation for format string extensions over C99.
  */
@@ -1556,8 +1554,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scnprintf);
  * into @buf. Use vsnprintf() or vscnprintf() in order to avoid
  * buffer overflows.
  *
- * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list.
- * You probably want sprintf() instead.
+ * If you're not already dealing with a va_list consider using sprintf().
  *
  * See the vsnprintf() documentation for format string extensions over C99.
  */