lib/list_sort: test: use more reasonable printk levels

I do not see any reason to use KERN_WARN for normal messages and
KERN_EMERG for error messages in the lib_sort testing routine.  Let's use
more reasonable KERN_NORM and KERN_ERR levels.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Cc: Don Mullis <don.mullis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/lib/list_sort.c b/lib/list_sort.c
index 827794016bfb..679b3a060e7e 100644
--- a/lib/list_sort.c
+++ b/lib/list_sort.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
         struct list_head *head = kmalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
         struct list_head *cur;
 
-        printk(KERN_WARNING "testing list_sort()\n");
+        printk(KERN_DEBUG "testing list_sort()\n");
 
         cur = head;
         for (i = 0; i < LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH; i++) {
@@ -189,17 +189,17 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
                 struct debug_el *el = container_of(cur, struct debug_el, l_h);
                 int cmp_result = cmp(NULL, cur, cur->next);
                 if (cur->next->prev != cur) {
-                        printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned "
-                                                "a corrupted list!\n");
+                        printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned "
+                                        "a corrupted list!\n");
                         return 1;
                 } else if (cmp_result > 0) {
-                        printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to sort!\n");
+                        printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to sort!\n");
                         return 1;
                 } else if (cmp_result == 0 &&
                                 el->serial >= container_of(cur->next,
                                         struct debug_el, l_h)->serial) {
-                        printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to preserve order"
-                                                 " of equivalent elements!\n");
+                        printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to preserve order "
+                                        "of equivalent elements!\n");
                         return 1;
                 }
                 kfree(cur->prev);
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
         }
         kfree(cur);
         if (count != LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH) {
-                printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned list of"
-                                                "different length!\n");
+                printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned list of "
+                                "different length!\n");
                 return 1;
         }
         return 0;