diff options
author | Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> | 2010-07-25 07:29:13 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> | 2010-08-07 12:53:55 -0400 |
commit | c5f7ad233b8805dae06e694538d8095b19f3c560 (patch) | |
tree | c47a1991fe1de055cfd06f5cecb8cfaa9f497ed7 /lib/ts_kmp.c | |
parent | 94eac5e62364df4e605e451218ee6024a7ba664f (diff) |
writeback: do not lose wake-ups in the forker thread - 1
Currently the forker thread can lose wake-ups which may lead to unnecessary
delays in processing bdi works. E.g., consider the following scenario.
1. 'bdi_forker_thread()' walks the 'bdi_list', finds out there is nothing to
do, and is about to finish the loop.
2. A bdi thread decides to exit because it was inactive for long time.
3. 'bdi_queue_work()' adds a work to the bdi which just exited, so it wakes up
the forker thread.
4. but 'bdi_forker_thread()' executes 'set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)'
and goes sleep. We lose a wake-up.
Losing the wake-up is not fatal, but this means that the bdi work processing
will be delayed by up to 5 sec. This race is theoretical, I never hit it, but
it is worth fixing.
The fix is to execute 'set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)' _before_ walking
'bdi_list', not after.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/ts_kmp.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions