Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!

1 files changed, 484 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/prio_tree.c b/lib/prio_tree.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ccfd850b0dec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/prio_tree.c
@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+/*
+ * lib/prio_tree.c - priority search tree
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2004, Rajesh Venkatasubramanian <vrajesh@umich.edu>
+ *
+ * This file is released under the GPL v2.
+ *
+ * Based on the radix priority search tree proposed by Edward M. McCreight
+ * SIAM Journal of Computing, vol. 14, no.2, pages 257-276, May 1985
+ *
+ * 02Feb2004    Initial version
+ */
+
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/prio_tree.h>
+
+/*
+ * A clever mix of heap and radix trees forms a radix priority search tree (PST)
+ * which is useful for storing intervals, e.g, we can consider a vma as a closed
+ * interval of file pages [offset_begin, offset_end], and store all vmas that
+ * map a file in a PST. Then, using the PST, we can answer a stabbing query,
+ * i.e., selecting a set of stored intervals (vmas) that overlap with (map) a
+ * given input interval X (a set of consecutive file pages), in "O(log n + m)"
+ * time where 'log n' is the height of the PST, and 'm' is the number of stored
+ * intervals (vmas) that overlap (map) with the input interval X (the set of
+ * consecutive file pages).
+ *
+ * In our implementation, we store closed intervals of the form [radix_index,
+ * heap_index]. We assume that always radix_index <= heap_index. McCreight's PST
+ * is designed for storing intervals with unique radix indices, i.e., each
+ * interval have different radix_index. However, this limitation can be easily
+ * overcome by using the size, i.e., heap_index - radix_index, as part of the
+ * index, so we index the tree using [(radix_index,size), heap_index].
+ *
+ * When the above-mentioned indexing scheme is used, theoretically, in a 32 bit
+ * machine, the maximum height of a PST can be 64. We can use a balanced version
+ * of the priority search tree to optimize the tree height, but the balanced
+ * tree proposed by McCreight is too complex and memory-hungry for our purpose.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * The following macros are used for implementing prio_tree for i_mmap
+ */
+
+#define RADIX_INDEX(vma)  ((vma)->vm_pgoff)
+#define VMA_SIZE(vma)     (((vma)->vm_end - (vma)->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
+/* avoid overflow */
+#define HEAP_INDEX(vma)   ((vma)->vm_pgoff + (VMA_SIZE(vma) - 1))
+
+
+static void get_index(const struct prio_tree_root *root,
+    const struct prio_tree_node *node,
+    unsigned long *radix, unsigned long *heap)
+{
+        if (root->raw) {
+                struct vm_area_struct *vma = prio_tree_entry(
+                    node, struct vm_area_struct, shared.prio_tree_node);
+
+                *radix = RADIX_INDEX(vma);
+                *heap = HEAP_INDEX(vma);
+        }
+        else {
+                *radix = node->start;
+                *heap = node->last;
+        }
+}
+
+static unsigned long index_bits_to_maxindex[BITS_PER_LONG];
+
+void __init prio_tree_init(void)
+{
+        unsigned int i;
+
+        for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(index_bits_to_maxindex) - 1; i++)
+                index_bits_to_maxindex[i] = (1UL << (i + 1)) - 1;
+        index_bits_to_maxindex[ARRAY_SIZE(index_bits_to_maxindex) - 1] = ~0UL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Maximum heap_index that can be stored in a PST with index_bits bits
+ */
+static inline unsigned long prio_tree_maxindex(unsigned int bits)
+{
+        return index_bits_to_maxindex[bits - 1];
+}
+
+/*
+ * Extend a priority search tree so that it can store a node with heap_index
+ * max_heap_index. In the worst case, this algorithm takes O((log n)^2).
+ * However, this function is used rarely and the common case performance is
+ * not bad.
+ */
+static struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_expand(struct prio_tree_root *root,
+                struct prio_tree_node *node, unsigned long max_heap_index)
+{
+        struct prio_tree_node *first = NULL, *prev, *last = NULL;
+
+        if (max_heap_index > prio_tree_maxindex(root->index_bits))
+                root->index_bits++;
+
+        while (max_heap_index > prio_tree_maxindex(root->index_bits)) {
+                root->index_bits++;
+
+                if (prio_tree_empty(root))
+                        continue;
+
+                if (first == NULL) {
+                        first = root->prio_tree_node;
+                        prio_tree_remove(root, root->prio_tree_node);
+                        INIT_PRIO_TREE_NODE(first);
+                        last = first;
+                } else {
+                        prev = last;
+                        last = root->prio_tree_node;
+                        prio_tree_remove(root, root->prio_tree_node);
+                        INIT_PRIO_TREE_NODE(last);
+                        prev->left = last;
+                        last->parent = prev;
+                }
+        }
+
+        INIT_PRIO_TREE_NODE(node);
+
+        if (first) {
+                node->left = first;
+                first->parent = node;
+        } else
+                last = node;
+
+        if (!prio_tree_empty(root)) {
+                last->left = root->prio_tree_node;
+                last->left->parent = last;
+        }
+
+        root->prio_tree_node = node;
+        return node;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Replace a prio_tree_node with a new node and return the old node
+ */
+struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_replace(struct prio_tree_root *root,
+                struct prio_tree_node *old, struct prio_tree_node *node)
+{
+        INIT_PRIO_TREE_NODE(node);
+
+        if (prio_tree_root(old)) {
+                BUG_ON(root->prio_tree_node != old);
+                /*
+                 * We can reduce root->index_bits here. However, it is complex
+                 * and does not help much to improve performance (IMO).
+                 */
+                node->parent = node;
+                root->prio_tree_node = node;
+        } else {
+                node->parent = old->parent;
+                if (old->parent->left == old)
+                        old->parent->left = node;
+                else
+                        old->parent->right = node;
+        }
+
+        if (!prio_tree_left_empty(old)) {
+                node->left = old->left;
+                old->left->parent = node;
+        }
+
+        if (!prio_tree_right_empty(old)) {
+                node->right = old->right;
+                old->right->parent = node;
+        }
+
+        return old;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Insert a prio_tree_node @node into a radix priority search tree @root. The
+ * algorithm typically takes O(log n) time where 'log n' is the number of bits
+ * required to represent the maximum heap_index. In the worst case, the algo
+ * can take O((log n)^2) - check prio_tree_expand.
+ *
+ * If a prior node with same radix_index and heap_index is already found in
+ * the tree, then returns the address of the prior node. Otherwise, inserts
+ * @node into the tree and returns @node.
+ */
+struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_insert(struct prio_tree_root *root,
+                struct prio_tree_node *node)
+{
+        struct prio_tree_node *cur, *res = node;
+        unsigned long radix_index, heap_index;
+        unsigned long r_index, h_index, index, mask;
+        int size_flag = 0;
+
+        get_index(root, node, &radix_index, &heap_index);
+
+        if (prio_tree_empty(root) ||
+                        heap_index > prio_tree_maxindex(root->index_bits))
+                return prio_tree_expand(root, node, heap_index);
+
+        cur = root->prio_tree_node;
+        mask = 1UL << (root->index_bits - 1);
+
+        while (mask) {
+                get_index(root, cur, &r_index, &h_index);
+
+                if (r_index == radix_index && h_index == heap_index)
+                        return cur;
+
+                if (h_index < heap_index ||
+                    (h_index == heap_index && r_index > radix_index)) {
+                        struct prio_tree_node *tmp = node;
+                        node = prio_tree_replace(root, cur, node);
+                        cur = tmp;
+                        /* swap indices */
+                        index = r_index;
+                        r_index = radix_index;
+                        radix_index = index;
+                        index = h_index;
+                        h_index = heap_index;
+                        heap_index = index;
+                }
+
+                if (size_flag)
+                        index = heap_index - radix_index;
+                else
+                        index = radix_index;
+
+                if (index & mask) {
+                        if (prio_tree_right_empty(cur)) {
+                                INIT_PRIO_TREE_NODE(node);
+                                cur->right = node;
+                                node->parent = cur;
+                                return res;
+                        } else
+                                cur = cur->right;
+                } else {
+                        if (prio_tree_left_empty(cur)) {
+                                INIT_PRIO_TREE_NODE(node);
+                                cur->left = node;
+                                node->parent = cur;
+                                return res;
+                        } else
+                                cur = cur->left;
+                }
+
+                mask >>= 1;
+
+                if (!mask) {
+                        mask = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
+                        size_flag = 1;
+                }
+        }
+        /* Should not reach here */
+        BUG();
+        return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Remove a prio_tree_node @node from a radix priority search tree @root. The
+ * algorithm takes O(log n) time where 'log n' is the number of bits required
+ * to represent the maximum heap_index.
+ */
+void prio_tree_remove(struct prio_tree_root *root, struct prio_tree_node *node)
+{
+        struct prio_tree_node *cur;
+        unsigned long r_index, h_index_right, h_index_left;
+
+        cur = node;
+
+        while (!prio_tree_left_empty(cur) || !prio_tree_right_empty(cur)) {
+                if (!prio_tree_left_empty(cur))
+                        get_index(root, cur->left, &r_index, &h_index_left);
+                else {
+                        cur = cur->right;
+                        continue;
+                }
+
+                if (!prio_tree_right_empty(cur))
+                        get_index(root, cur->right, &r_index, &h_index_right);
+                else {
+                        cur = cur->left;
+                        continue;
+                }
+
+                /* both h_index_left and h_index_right cannot be 0 */
+                if (h_index_left >= h_index_right)
+                        cur = cur->left;
+                else
+                        cur = cur->right;
+        }
+
+        if (prio_tree_root(cur)) {
+                BUG_ON(root->prio_tree_node != cur);
+                __INIT_PRIO_TREE_ROOT(root, root->raw);
+                return;
+        }
+
+        if (cur->parent->right == cur)
+                cur->parent->right = cur->parent;
+        else
+                cur->parent->left = cur->parent;
+
+        while (cur != node)
+                cur = prio_tree_replace(root, cur->parent, cur);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Following functions help to enumerate all prio_tree_nodes in the tree that
+ * overlap with the input interval X [radix_index, heap_index]. The enumeration
+ * takes O(log n + m) time where 'log n' is the height of the tree (which is
+ * proportional to # of bits required to represent the maximum heap_index) and
+ * 'm' is the number of prio_tree_nodes that overlap the interval X.
+ */
+
+static struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_left(struct prio_tree_iter *iter,
+                unsigned long *r_index, unsigned long *h_index)
+{
+        if (prio_tree_left_empty(iter->cur))
+                return NULL;
+
+        get_index(iter->root, iter->cur->left, r_index, h_index);
+
+        if (iter->r_index <= *h_index) {
+                iter->cur = iter->cur->left;
+                iter->mask >>= 1;
+                if (iter->mask) {
+                        if (iter->size_level)
+                                iter->size_level++;
+                } else {
+                        if (iter->size_level) {
+                                BUG_ON(!prio_tree_left_empty(iter->cur));
+                                BUG_ON(!prio_tree_right_empty(iter->cur));
+                                iter->size_level++;
+                                iter->mask = ULONG_MAX;
+                        } else {
+                                iter->size_level = 1;
+                                iter->mask = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
+                        }
+                }
+                return iter->cur;
+        }
+
+        return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_right(struct prio_tree_iter *iter,
+                unsigned long *r_index, unsigned long *h_index)
+{
+        unsigned long value;
+
+        if (prio_tree_right_empty(iter->cur))
+                return NULL;
+
+        if (iter->size_level)
+                value = iter->value;
+        else
+                value = iter->value | iter->mask;
+
+        if (iter->h_index < value)
+                return NULL;
+
+        get_index(iter->root, iter->cur->right, r_index, h_index);
+
+        if (iter->r_index <= *h_index) {
+                iter->cur = iter->cur->right;
+                iter->mask >>= 1;
+                iter->value = value;
+                if (iter->mask) {
+                        if (iter->size_level)
+                                iter->size_level++;
+                } else {
+                        if (iter->size_level) {
+                                BUG_ON(!prio_tree_left_empty(iter->cur));
+                                BUG_ON(!prio_tree_right_empty(iter->cur));
+                                iter->size_level++;
+                                iter->mask = ULONG_MAX;
+                        } else {
+                                iter->size_level = 1;
+                                iter->mask = 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
+                        }
+                }
+                return iter->cur;
+        }
+
+        return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_parent(struct prio_tree_iter *iter)
+{
+        iter->cur = iter->cur->parent;
+        if (iter->mask == ULONG_MAX)
+                iter->mask = 1UL;
+        else if (iter->size_level == 1)
+                iter->mask = 1UL;
+        else
+                iter->mask <<= 1;
+        if (iter->size_level)
+                iter->size_level--;
+        if (!iter->size_level && (iter->value & iter->mask))
+                iter->value ^= iter->mask;
+        return iter->cur;
+}
+
+static inline int overlap(struct prio_tree_iter *iter,
+                unsigned long r_index, unsigned long h_index)
+{
+        return iter->h_index >= r_index && iter->r_index <= h_index;
+}
+
+/*
+ * prio_tree_first:
+ *
+ * Get the first prio_tree_node that overlaps with the interval [radix_index,
+ * heap_index]. Note that always radix_index <= heap_index. We do a pre-order
+ * traversal of the tree.
+ */
+static struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_first(struct prio_tree_iter *iter)
+{
+        struct prio_tree_root *root;
+        unsigned long r_index, h_index;
+
+        INIT_PRIO_TREE_ITER(iter);
+
+        root = iter->root;
+        if (prio_tree_empty(root))
+                return NULL;
+
+        get_index(root, root->prio_tree_node, &r_index, &h_index);
+
+        if (iter->r_index > h_index)
+                return NULL;
+
+        iter->mask = 1UL << (root->index_bits - 1);
+        iter->cur = root->prio_tree_node;
+
+        while (1) {
+                if (overlap(iter, r_index, h_index))
+                        return iter->cur;
+
+                if (prio_tree_left(iter, &r_index, &h_index))
+                        continue;
+
+                if (prio_tree_right(iter, &r_index, &h_index))
+                        continue;
+
+                break;
+        }
+        return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * prio_tree_next:
+ *
+ * Get the next prio_tree_node that overlaps with the input interval in iter
+ */
+struct prio_tree_node *prio_tree_next(struct prio_tree_iter *iter)
+{
+        unsigned long r_index, h_index;
+
+        if (iter->cur == NULL)
+                return prio_tree_first(iter);
+
+repeat:
+        while (prio_tree_left(iter, &r_index, &h_index))
+                if (overlap(iter, r_index, h_index))
+                        return iter->cur;
+
+        while (!prio_tree_right(iter, &r_index, &h_index)) {
+                while (!prio_tree_root(iter->cur) &&
+                                iter->cur->parent->right == iter->cur)
+                        prio_tree_parent(iter);
+
+                if (prio_tree_root(iter->cur))
+                        return NULL;
+
+                prio_tree_parent(iter);
+        }
+
+        if (overlap(iter, r_index, h_index))
+                return iter->cur;
+
+        goto repeat;
+}