percpu_rw_semaphore: add lockdep annotations

Add lockdep annotations.  Not only this can help to find the potential
problems, we do not want the false warnings if, say, the task takes two
different percpu_rw_semaphore's for reading.  IOW, at least ->rw_sem
should not use a single class.

This patch exposes this internal lock to lockdep so that it represents the
whole percpu_rw_semaphore.  This way we do not need to add another "fake"
->lockdep_map and lock_class_key.  More importantly, this also makes the
output from lockdep much more understandable if it finds the problem.

In short, with this patch from lockdep pov percpu_down_read() and
percpu_up_read() acquire/release ->rw_sem for reading, this matches the
actual semantics.  This abuses __up_read() but I hope this is fine and in
fact I'd like to have down_read_no_lockdep() as well,
percpu_down_read_recursive_readers() will need it.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/lib/percpu-rwsem.c b/lib/percpu-rwsem.c
index ce92ab563a08..652a8ee8efe9 100644
--- a/lib/percpu-rwsem.c
+++ b/lib/percpu-rwsem.c
@@ -2,18 +2,21 @@
 #include <linux/rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
 #include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 
-int percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
+int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw,
+                        const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwsem_key)
 {
         brw->fast_read_ctr = alloc_percpu(int);
         if (unlikely(!brw->fast_read_ctr))
                 return -ENOMEM;
 
-        init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem);
+        /* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */
+        __init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key);
         atomic_set(&brw->write_ctr, 0);
         atomic_set(&brw->slow_read_ctr, 0);
         init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq);
@@ -66,19 +69,29 @@ static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val)
 /*
  * Like the normal down_read() this is not recursive, the writer can
  * come after the first percpu_down_read() and create the deadlock.
+ *
+ * Note: returns with lock_is_held(brw->rw_sem) == T for lockdep,
+ * percpu_up_read() does rwsem_release(). This pairs with the usage
+ * of ->rw_sem in percpu_down/up_write().
  */
 void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 {
-        if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1)))
+        might_sleep();
+        if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1))) {
+                rwsem_acquire_read(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
                 return;
+        }
 
         down_read(&brw->rw_sem);
         atomic_inc(&brw->slow_read_ctr);
-        up_read(&brw->rw_sem);
+        /* avoid up_read()->rwsem_release() */
+        __up_read(&brw->rw_sem);
 }
 
 void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 {
+        rwsem_release(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
+
         if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, -1)))
                 return;