[PATCH] list: use list_replace_init() instead of list_splice_init()

list_splice_init(list, head) does unneeded job if it is known that
list_empty(head) == 1.  We can use list_replace_init() instead.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 880fb415a8f6..740c5abceb07 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -531,11 +531,11 @@ int current_is_keventd(void)
 static void take_over_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq, unsigned int cpu)
 {
         struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu);
-        LIST_HEAD(list);
+        struct list_head list;
         struct work_struct *work;
 
         spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
-        list_splice_init(&cwq->worklist, &list);
+        list_replace_init(&cwq->worklist, &list);
 
         while (!list_empty(&list)) {
                 printk("Taking work for %s\n", wq->name);