tick: Remove code duplication in tick_handle_periodic()

tick_handle_periodic() is calling ktime_add() at two places, first before the
infinite loop and then at the end of infinite loop. We can rearrange code a bit
to fix code duplication here.

It looks quite simple and shouldn't break anything, I guess :)

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/be3481e8f3f71df694a4b43623254fc93ca51b59.1395735873.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 0fec63414fb6..015661279b68 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -98,18 +98,19 @@ static void tick_periodic(int cpu)
 void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev)
 {
         int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-        ktime_t next;
+        ktime_t next = dev->next_event;
 
         tick_periodic(cpu);
 
         if (dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT)
                 return;
-        /*
-         * Setup the next period for devices, which do not have
-         * periodic mode:
-         */
-        next = ktime_add(dev->next_event, tick_period);
         for (;;) {
+                /*
+                 * Setup the next period for devices, which do not have
+                 * periodic mode:
+                 */
+                next = ktime_add(next, tick_period);
+
                 if (!clockevents_program_event(dev, next, false))
                         return;
                 /*
@@ -123,7 +124,6 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev)
                  */
                 if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres())
                         tick_periodic(cpu);
-                next = ktime_add(next, tick_period);
         }
 }