diff options
author | Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> | 2008-01-25 15:08:23 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-01-25 15:08:23 -0500 |
commit | c49443c538c1bbf50eda27e4a3711e9fc15176b0 (patch) | |
tree | 8dece13f1f5c48422359c981a4ef8bba92136597 /kernel/sched_rt.c | |
parent | cdc8eb984ce47a7c90a049f45229f7b0d59ba781 (diff) |
sched: remove some old cpuset logic
We had support for overlapping cpuset based rto logic in early
prototypes that is no longer used, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched_rt.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched_rt.c | 33 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c index a386758ffebb..9affb3c9d3db 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c | |||
@@ -586,38 +586,6 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) | |||
586 | continue; | 586 | continue; |
587 | 587 | ||
588 | src_rq = cpu_rq(cpu); | 588 | src_rq = cpu_rq(cpu); |
589 | if (unlikely(src_rq->rt.rt_nr_running <= 1)) { | ||
590 | /* | ||
591 | * It is possible that overlapping cpusets | ||
592 | * will miss clearing a non overloaded runqueue. | ||
593 | * Clear it now. | ||
594 | */ | ||
595 | if (double_lock_balance(this_rq, src_rq)) { | ||
596 | /* unlocked our runqueue lock */ | ||
597 | struct task_struct *old_next = next; | ||
598 | |||
599 | next = pick_next_task_rt(this_rq); | ||
600 | if (next != old_next) | ||
601 | ret = 1; | ||
602 | } | ||
603 | if (likely(src_rq->rt.rt_nr_running <= 1)) { | ||
604 | /* | ||
605 | * Small chance that this_rq->curr changed | ||
606 | * but it's really harmless here. | ||
607 | */ | ||
608 | rt_clear_overload(this_rq); | ||
609 | } else { | ||
610 | /* | ||
611 | * Heh, the src_rq is now overloaded, since | ||
612 | * we already have the src_rq lock, go straight | ||
613 | * to pulling tasks from it. | ||
614 | */ | ||
615 | goto try_pulling; | ||
616 | } | ||
617 | spin_unlock(&src_rq->lock); | ||
618 | continue; | ||
619 | } | ||
620 | |||
621 | /* | 589 | /* |
622 | * We can potentially drop this_rq's lock in | 590 | * We can potentially drop this_rq's lock in |
623 | * double_lock_balance, and another CPU could | 591 | * double_lock_balance, and another CPU could |
@@ -641,7 +609,6 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) | |||
641 | continue; | 609 | continue; |
642 | } | 610 | } |
643 | 611 | ||
644 | try_pulling: | ||
645 | p = pick_next_highest_task_rt(src_rq, this_cpu); | 612 | p = pick_next_highest_task_rt(src_rq, this_cpu); |
646 | 613 | ||
647 | /* | 614 | /* |