rcu: Fix broken strings in RCU's source code.

Although the C language allows you to break strings across lines, doing
this makes it hard for people to find the Linux kernel code corresponding
to a given console message.  This commit therefore fixes broken strings
throughout RCU's source code.

Suggested-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
index a16ddbd6fdc4..abffb486e94e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
@@ -218,8 +218,7 @@ static const struct file_operations rcudata_csv_fops = {
 
 static void print_one_rcu_node_boost(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
-        seq_printf(m,  "%d:%d tasks=%c%c%c%c kt=%c ntb=%lu neb=%lu nnb=%lu "
-                   "j=%04x bt=%04x\n",
+        seq_printf(m, "%d:%d tasks=%c%c%c%c kt=%c ntb=%lu neb=%lu nnb=%lu ",
                    rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
                    "T."[list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks)],
                    "N."[!rnp->gp_tasks],
@@ -227,11 +226,11 @@ static void print_one_rcu_node_boost(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_node *rnp)
                    "B."[!rnp->boost_tasks],
                    convert_kthread_status(rnp->boost_kthread_status),
                    rnp->n_tasks_boosted, rnp->n_exp_boosts,
-                   rnp->n_normal_boosts,
+                   rnp->n_normal_boosts);
+        seq_printf(m, "j=%04x bt=%04x\n",
                    (int)(jiffies & 0xffff),
                    (int)(rnp->boost_time & 0xffff));
-        seq_printf(m, "%s: nt=%lu egt=%lu bt=%lu nb=%lu ny=%lu nos=%lu\n",
-                   "     balk",
+        seq_printf(m, "    balk: nt=%lu egt=%lu bt=%lu nb=%lu ny=%lu nos=%lu\n",
                    rnp->n_balk_blkd_tasks,
                    rnp->n_balk_exp_gp_tasks,
                    rnp->n_balk_boost_tasks,
@@ -287,11 +286,11 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
         struct rcu_node *rnp;
 
         gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
-        seq_printf(m, "%s: c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
-                      "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
+        seq_printf(m, "%s: c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x ",
                    rsp->name, rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
                    (long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies),
-                   (int)(jiffies & 0xffff),
+                   (int)(jiffies & 0xffff));
+        seq_printf(m, "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
                    rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
                    rsp->n_force_qs - rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
                    rsp->n_force_qs_lh, rsp->qlen_lazy, rsp->qlen);
@@ -378,16 +377,16 @@ static const struct file_operations rcugp_fops = {
 
 static void print_one_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
-        seq_printf(m, "%3d%cnp=%ld "
-                   "qsp=%ld rpq=%ld cbr=%ld cng=%ld "
-                   "gpc=%ld gps=%ld nf=%ld nn=%ld\n",
+        seq_printf(m, "%3d%cnp=%ld ",
                    rdp->cpu,
                    cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) ? '!' : ' ',
-                   rdp->n_rcu_pending,
+                   rdp->n_rcu_pending);
+        seq_printf(m, "qsp=%ld rpq=%ld cbr=%ld cng=%ld ",
                    rdp->n_rp_qs_pending,
                    rdp->n_rp_report_qs,
                    rdp->n_rp_cb_ready,
-                   rdp->n_rp_cpu_needs_gp,
+                   rdp->n_rp_cpu_needs_gp);
+        seq_printf(m, "gpc=%ld gps=%ld nf=%ld nn=%ld\n",
                    rdp->n_rp_gp_completed,
                    rdp->n_rp_gp_started,
                    rdp->n_rp_need_fqs,