locking/mutex: Further simplify mutex_spin_on_owner()

Similar to what Linus suggested for rwsem_spin_on_owner(), in
mutex_spin_on_owner() instead of having while (true) and
breaking out of the spin loop on lock->owner != owner, we can
have the loop directly check for while (lock->owner == owner) to
improve the readability of the code.

It also shrinks the code a bit:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   3721       0       0    3721     e89 mutex.o.before
   3705       0       0    3705     e79 mutex.o.after

Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1428521960-5268-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com
[ Added code generation info. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 16b2d3cc88b0..4cccea6b8934 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -224,20 +224,14 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_slowpath(struct ww_mutex *lock,
 static noinline
 bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
 {
-        bool ret;
+        bool ret = true;
 
         rcu_read_lock();
-        while (true) {
-                /* Return success when the lock owner changed */
-                if (lock->owner != owner) {
-                        ret = true;
-                        break;
-                }
-
+        while (lock->owner == owner) {
                 /*
                  * Ensure we emit the owner->on_cpu, dereference _after_
-                 * checking lock->owner still matches owner, if that fails,
-                 * owner might point to free()d memory, if it still matches,
+                 * checking lock->owner still matches owner. If that fails,
+                 * owner might point to freed memory. If it still matches,
                  * the rcu_read_lock() ensures the memory stays valid.
                  */
                 barrier();