Merge branch 'cgroup/for-3.7-fixes' into cgroup/for-3.8

This is to receive device_cgroup fixes so that further device_cgroup
changes can be made in cgroup/for-3.8.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 31 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index e3045ad4267a..3070164e2036 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -1911,9 +1911,8 @@ static void cgroup_task_migrate(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
          * trading it for newcg is protected by cgroup_mutex, we're safe to drop
          * it here; it will be freed under RCU.
          */
-        put_css_set(oldcg);
-
         set_bit(CGRP_RELEASABLE, &oldcgrp->flags);
+        put_css_set(oldcg);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -4681,31 +4680,20 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_cgroupstats_operations = {
  *
  * A pointer to the shared css_set was automatically copied in
  * fork.c by dup_task_struct().  However, we ignore that copy, since
- * it was not made under the protection of RCU, cgroup_mutex or
- * threadgroup_change_begin(), so it might no longer be a valid
- * cgroup pointer.  cgroup_attach_task() might have already changed
- * current->cgroups, allowing the previously referenced cgroup
- * group to be removed and freed.
- *
- * Outside the pointer validity we also need to process the css_set
- * inheritance between threadgoup_change_begin() and
- * threadgoup_change_end(), this way there is no leak in any process
- * wide migration performed by cgroup_attach_proc() that could otherwise
- * miss a thread because it is too early or too late in the fork stage.
+ * it was not made under the protection of RCU or cgroup_mutex, so
+ * might no longer be a valid cgroup pointer.  cgroup_attach_task() might
+ * have already changed current->cgroups, allowing the previously
+ * referenced cgroup group to be removed and freed.
  *
  * At the point that cgroup_fork() is called, 'current' is the parent
  * task, and the passed argument 'child' points to the child task.
  */
 void cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *child)
 {
-        /*
-         * We don't need to task_lock() current because current->cgroups
-         * can't be changed concurrently here. The parent obviously hasn't
-         * exited and called cgroup_exit(), and we are synchronized against
-         * cgroup migration through threadgroup_change_begin().
-         */
+        task_lock(current);
         child->cgroups = current->cgroups;
         get_css_set(child->cgroups);
+        task_unlock(current);
         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&child->cg_list);
 }
 
@@ -4736,19 +4724,10 @@ void cgroup_post_fork(struct task_struct *child)
          */
         if (use_task_css_set_links) {
                 write_lock(&css_set_lock);
-                if (list_empty(&child->cg_list)) {
-                        /*
-                         * It's safe to use child->cgroups without task_lock()
-                         * here because we are protected through
-                         * threadgroup_change_begin() against concurrent
-                         * css_set change in cgroup_task_migrate(). Also
-                         * the task can't exit at that point until
-                         * wake_up_new_task() is called, so we are protected
-                         * against cgroup_exit() setting child->cgroup to
-                         * init_css_set.
-                         */
+                task_lock(child);
+                if (list_empty(&child->cg_list))
                         list_add(&child->cg_list, &child->cgroups->tasks);
-                }
+                task_unlock(child);
                 write_unlock(&css_set_lock);
         }