aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2006-06-29 05:24:36 -0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>2006-06-29 13:26:21 -0400
commitd1bef4ed5faf7d9872337b33c4269e45ae1bf960 (patch)
treea88c58e3102396382e9137a25a884af14421f6a6 /include
parentcfb9e32f2ff32ef5265c1c80fe68dd1a7f03a604 (diff)
[PATCH] genirq: rename desc->handler to desc->chip
This patch-queue improves the generic IRQ layer to be truly generic, by adding various abstractions and features to it, without impacting existing functionality. While the queue can be best described as "fix and improve everything in the generic IRQ layer that we could think of", and thus it consists of many smaller features and lots of cleanups, the one feature that stands out most is the new 'irq chip' abstraction. The irq-chip abstraction is about describing and coding and IRQ controller driver by mapping its raw hardware capabilities [and quirks, if needed] in a straightforward way, without having to think about "IRQ flow" (level/edge/etc.) type of details. This stands in contrast with the current 'irq-type' model of genirq architectures, which 'mixes' raw hardware capabilities with 'flow' details. The patchset supports both types of irq controller designs at once, and converts i386 and x86_64 to the new irq-chip design. As a bonus side-effect of the irq-chip approach, chained interrupt controllers (master/slave PIC constructs, etc.) are now supported by design as well. The end result of this patchset intends to be simpler architecture-level code and more consolidation between architectures. We reused many bits of code and many concepts from Russell King's ARM IRQ layer, the merging of which was one of the motivations for this patchset. This patch: rename desc->handler to desc->chip. Originally i did not want to do this, because it's a big patch. But having both "desc->handler", "desc->handle_irq" and "action->handler" caused a large degree of confusion and made the code appear alot less clean than it truly is. I have also attempted a dual approach as well by introducing a desc->chip alias - but that just wasnt robust enough and broke frequently. So lets get over with this quickly. The conversion was done automatically via scripts and converts all the code in the kernel. This renaming patch is the first one amongst the patches, so that the remaining patches can stay flexible and can be merged and split up without having some big monolithic patch act as a merge barrier. [akpm@osdl.org: build fix] [akpm@osdl.org: another build fix] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/asm-powerpc/hw_irq.h12
-rw-r--r--include/linux/irq.h4
2 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/hw_irq.h b/include/asm-powerpc/hw_irq.h
index ce0f7db63c16..a27ed3feb315 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/hw_irq.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/hw_irq.h
@@ -86,20 +86,20 @@ static inline void local_irq_save_ptr(unsigned long *flags)
86#define mask_irq(irq) \ 86#define mask_irq(irq) \
87 ({ \ 87 ({ \
88 irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq); \ 88 irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq); \
89 if (desc->handler && desc->handler->disable) \ 89 if (desc->chip && desc->chip->disable) \
90 desc->handler->disable(irq); \ 90 desc->chip->disable(irq); \
91 }) 91 })
92#define unmask_irq(irq) \ 92#define unmask_irq(irq) \
93 ({ \ 93 ({ \
94 irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq); \ 94 irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq); \
95 if (desc->handler && desc->handler->enable) \ 95 if (desc->chip && desc->chip->enable) \
96 desc->handler->enable(irq); \ 96 desc->chip->enable(irq); \
97 }) 97 })
98#define ack_irq(irq) \ 98#define ack_irq(irq) \
99 ({ \ 99 ({ \
100 irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq); \ 100 irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq); \
101 if (desc->handler && desc->handler->ack) \ 101 if (desc->chip && desc->chip->ack) \
102 desc->handler->ack(irq); \ 102 desc->chip->ack(irq); \
103 }) 103 })
104 104
105/* Should we handle this via lost interrupts and IPIs or should we don't care like 105/* Should we handle this via lost interrupts and IPIs or should we don't care like
diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index 676e00dfb21a..9597a6904239 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ typedef struct hw_interrupt_type hw_irq_controller;
69 * Pad this out to 32 bytes for cache and indexing reasons. 69 * Pad this out to 32 bytes for cache and indexing reasons.
70 */ 70 */
71typedef struct irq_desc { 71typedef struct irq_desc {
72 hw_irq_controller *handler; 72 hw_irq_controller *chip;
73 void *handler_data; 73 void *chip_data;
74 struct irqaction *action; /* IRQ action list */ 74 struct irqaction *action; /* IRQ action list */
75 unsigned int status; /* IRQ status */ 75 unsigned int status; /* IRQ status */
76 unsigned int depth; /* nested irq disables */ 76 unsigned int depth; /* nested irq disables */