aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>2011-04-21 20:19:44 -0400
committerWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>2011-06-07 20:25:21 -0400
commitf758eeabeb96f878c860e8f110f94ec8820822a9 (patch)
treefea5a465aa0aa38c6c9263eb264acbeb7f722c02 /include
parent424b351fe1901fc909fd0ca4f21dab58f24c1aac (diff)
writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock
Split the global inode_wb_list_lock into a per-bdi_writeback list_lock, as it's currently the most contended lock in the system for metadata heavy workloads. It won't help for single-filesystem workloads for which we'll need the I/O-less balance_dirty_pages, but at least we can dedicate a cpu to spinning on each bdi now for larger systems. Based on earlier patches from Nick Piggin and Dave Chinner. It reduces lock contentions to 1/4 in this test case: 10 HDD JBOD, 100 dd on each disk, XFS, 6GB ram lock_stat version 0.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total acq-bounces acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vanilla 2.6.39-rc3: inode_wb_list_lock: 42590 44433 0.12 147.74 144127.35 252274 886792 0.08 121.34 917211.23 ------------------ inode_wb_list_lock 2 [<ffffffff81165da5>] bdev_inode_switch_bdi+0x29/0x85 inode_wb_list_lock 34 [<ffffffff8115bd0b>] inode_wb_list_del+0x22/0x49 inode_wb_list_lock 12893 [<ffffffff8115bb53>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x170/0x1d0 inode_wb_list_lock 10702 [<ffffffff8115afef>] writeback_single_inode+0x16d/0x20a ------------------ inode_wb_list_lock 2 [<ffffffff81165da5>] bdev_inode_switch_bdi+0x29/0x85 inode_wb_list_lock 19 [<ffffffff8115bd0b>] inode_wb_list_del+0x22/0x49 inode_wb_list_lock 5550 [<ffffffff8115bb53>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x170/0x1d0 inode_wb_list_lock 8511 [<ffffffff8115b4ad>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x10f/0x157 2.6.39-rc3 + patch: &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock: 11383 11657 0.14 151.69 40429.51 90825 527918 0.11 145.90 556843.37 ------------------------ &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock 10 [<ffffffff8115b189>] inode_wb_list_del+0x5f/0x86 &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock 1493 [<ffffffff8115b1ed>] writeback_inodes_wb+0x3d/0x150 &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock 3652 [<ffffffff8115a8e9>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x123/0x16f &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock 1412 [<ffffffff8115a38e>] writeback_single_inode+0x17f/0x223 ------------------------ &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock 3 [<ffffffff8110b5af>] bdi_lock_two+0x46/0x4b &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock 6 [<ffffffff8115b189>] inode_wb_list_del+0x5f/0x86 &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock 2061 [<ffffffff8115af97>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x173/0x1cf &(&wb->list_lock)->rlock 2629 [<ffffffff8115a8e9>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x123/0x16f hughd@google.com: fix recursive lock when bdi_lock_two() is called with new the same as old akpm@linux-foundation.org: cleanup bdev_inode_switch_bdi() comment Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/backing-dev.h2
-rw-r--r--include/linux/writeback.h2
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
index 96f4094b706d..47feb2c4706a 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct bdi_writeback {
57 struct list_head b_dirty; /* dirty inodes */ 57 struct list_head b_dirty; /* dirty inodes */
58 struct list_head b_io; /* parked for writeback */ 58 struct list_head b_io; /* parked for writeback */
59 struct list_head b_more_io; /* parked for more writeback */ 59 struct list_head b_more_io; /* parked for more writeback */
60 spinlock_t list_lock; /* protects the b_* lists */
60}; 61};
61 62
62struct backing_dev_info { 63struct backing_dev_info {
@@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ int bdi_writeback_thread(void *data);
106int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi); 107int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
107void bdi_arm_supers_timer(void); 108void bdi_arm_supers_timer(void);
108void bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed(struct backing_dev_info *bdi); 109void bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
110void bdi_lock_two(struct bdi_writeback *wb1, struct bdi_writeback *wb2);
109 111
110extern spinlock_t bdi_lock; 112extern spinlock_t bdi_lock;
111extern struct list_head bdi_list; 113extern struct list_head bdi_list;
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 7df9026f7129..c2d957fb38d3 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -9,8 +9,6 @@
9 9
10struct backing_dev_info; 10struct backing_dev_info;
11 11
12extern spinlock_t inode_wb_list_lock;
13
14/* 12/*
15 * fs/fs-writeback.c 13 * fs/fs-writeback.c
16 */ 14 */