diff options
author | Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> | 2008-10-22 01:19:00 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-10-23 00:53:53 -0400 |
commit | 930cc144a043ff95e56b6888fa51c618b33f89e7 (patch) | |
tree | 95a446505d2e15ea2d1f4464c2a7a014402a4b95 /include | |
parent | d41e2d7317cd55cc5135356a05c289537b0f6d70 (diff) |
math-emu: Fix signalling of underflow and inexact while packing result.
I'm trying to move the powerpc math-emu code to use the include/math-emu bits.
In doing so I've been using TestFloat to see how good or bad we are
doing. For the most part the current math-emu code that PPC uses has
a number of issues that the code in include/math-emu seems to solve
(plus bugs we've had for ever that no one every realized).
Anyways, I've come across a case that we are flagging underflow and
inexact because we think we have a denormalized result from a double
precision divide:
000.FFFFFFFFFFFFF / 3FE.FFFFFFFFFFFFE
soft: 001.0000000000000 ..... syst: 001.0000000000000 ...ux
What it looks like is the results out of FP_DIV_D are:
D:
sign: 0
mantissa: 01000000 00000000
exp: -1023 (0)
The problem seems like we aren't normalizing the result and bumping the exp.
Now that I'm digging into this a bit I'm thinking my issue has to do with
the fix DaveM put in place from back in Aug 2007 (commit
405849610fd96b4f34cd1875c4c033228fea6c0f):
[MATH-EMU]: Fix underflow exception reporting.
2) we ended up rounding back up to normal (this is the case where
we set the exponent to 1 and set the fraction to zero), this
should set inexact too
...
Another example, "0x0.0000000000001p-1022 / 16.0", should signal both
inexact and underflow. The cpu implementations and ieee1754
literature is very clear about this. This is case #2 above.
Here is the distilled glibc test case from Jakub Jelinek which prompted that
commit:
--------------------
#include <float.h>
#include <fenv.h>
#include <stdio.h>
volatile double d = DBL_MIN;
volatile double e = 0x0.0000000000001p-1022;
volatile double f = 16.0;
int
main (void)
{
printf ("%x\n", fetestexcept (FE_UNDERFLOW));
d /= f;
printf ("%x\n", fetestexcept (FE_UNDERFLOW));
e /= f;
printf ("%x\n", fetestexcept (FE_UNDERFLOW));
return 0;
}
--------------------
It looks like the case I have we are exact before rounding, but think it
looks like the rounding case since it appears as if "overflow is set".
000.FFFFFFFFFFFFF / 3FE.FFFFFFFFFFFFE = 001.0000000000000
I think the following adds the check for my case and still works for the
issue your commit was trying to resolve.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r-- | include/math-emu/op-common.h | 17 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/include/math-emu/op-common.h b/include/math-emu/op-common.h index cc1ec396f8d6..bc50aa0d6d73 100644 --- a/include/math-emu/op-common.h +++ b/include/math-emu/op-common.h | |||
@@ -139,18 +139,27 @@ do { \ | |||
139 | if (X##_e <= _FP_WFRACBITS_##fs) \ | 139 | if (X##_e <= _FP_WFRACBITS_##fs) \ |
140 | { \ | 140 | { \ |
141 | _FP_FRAC_SRS_##wc(X, X##_e, _FP_WFRACBITS_##fs); \ | 141 | _FP_FRAC_SRS_##wc(X, X##_e, _FP_WFRACBITS_##fs); \ |
142 | _FP_ROUND(wc, X); \ | ||
143 | if (_FP_FRAC_HIGH_##fs(X) \ | 142 | if (_FP_FRAC_HIGH_##fs(X) \ |
144 | & (_FP_OVERFLOW_##fs >> 1)) \ | 143 | & (_FP_OVERFLOW_##fs >> 1)) \ |
145 | { \ | 144 | { \ |
146 | X##_e = 1; \ | 145 | X##_e = 1; \ |
147 | _FP_FRAC_SET_##wc(X, _FP_ZEROFRAC_##wc); \ | 146 | _FP_FRAC_SET_##wc(X, _FP_ZEROFRAC_##wc); \ |
148 | FP_SET_EXCEPTION(FP_EX_INEXACT); \ | ||
149 | } \ | 147 | } \ |
150 | else \ | 148 | else \ |
151 | { \ | 149 | { \ |
152 | X##_e = 0; \ | 150 | _FP_ROUND(wc, X); \ |
153 | _FP_FRAC_SRL_##wc(X, _FP_WORKBITS); \ | 151 | if (_FP_FRAC_HIGH_##fs(X) \ |
152 | & (_FP_OVERFLOW_##fs >> 1)) \ | ||
153 | { \ | ||
154 | X##_e = 1; \ | ||
155 | _FP_FRAC_SET_##wc(X, _FP_ZEROFRAC_##wc); \ | ||
156 | FP_SET_EXCEPTION(FP_EX_INEXACT); \ | ||
157 | } \ | ||
158 | else \ | ||
159 | { \ | ||
160 | X##_e = 0; \ | ||
161 | _FP_FRAC_SRL_##wc(X, _FP_WORKBITS); \ | ||
162 | } \ | ||
154 | } \ | 163 | } \ |
155 | if ((FP_CUR_EXCEPTIONS & FP_EX_INEXACT) || \ | 164 | if ((FP_CUR_EXCEPTIONS & FP_EX_INEXACT) || \ |
156 | (FP_TRAPPING_EXCEPTIONS & FP_EX_UNDERFLOW)) \ | 165 | (FP_TRAPPING_EXCEPTIONS & FP_EX_UNDERFLOW)) \ |