[PATCH] Fix comment to synchronize_sched()

Fix to broken comment to synchronize_rcu() noted by Keith Owens.  Also add
sentence noting that synchronize_sched() and synchronize_rcu() are not
necessarily identical.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 981f9aa43353..b87aefa082e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -240,11 +240,14 @@ extern int rcu_pending(int cpu);
  * This means that all preempt_disable code sequences, including NMI and
  * hardware-interrupt handlers, in progress on entry will have completed
  * before this primitive returns.  However, this does not guarantee that
- * softirq handlers will have completed, since in some kernels
+ * softirq handlers will have completed, since in some kernels, these
+ * handlers can run in process context, and can block.
  *
  * This primitive provides the guarantees made by the (deprecated)
  * synchronize_kernel() API.  In contrast, synchronize_rcu() only
  * guarantees that rcu_read_lock() sections will have completed.
+ * In "classic RCU", these two guarantees happen to be one and
+ * the same, but can differ in realtime RCU implementations.
  */
 #define synchronize_sched() synchronize_rcu()