common implementation of iterative div/mod

We have a few instances of the open-coded iterative div/mod loop, used
when we don't expcet the dividend to be much bigger than the divisor.
Unfortunately modern gcc's have the tendency to strength "reduce" this
into a full mod operation, which isn't necessarily any faster, and
even if it were, doesn't exist if gcc implements it in libgcc.

The workaround is to put a dummy asm statement in the loop to prevent
gcc from performing the transformation.

This patch creates a single implementation of this loop, and uses it
to replace the open-coded versions I know about.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

2 files changed, 4 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/math64.h b/include/linux/math64.h
index c1a5f81501ff..177785e1e4a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/math64.h
+++ b/include/linux/math64.h
@@ -81,4 +81,6 @@ static inline s64 div_s64(s64 dividend, s32 divisor)
 }
 #endif
 
+u32 iter_div_u64_rem(u64 dividend, u32 divisor, u64 *remainder);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_MATH64_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/time.h b/include/linux/time.h
index d32ef0ad4c0a..05f9517a8ed1 100644
--- a/include/linux/time.h
+++ b/include/linux/time.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 # include <linux/cache.h>
 # include <linux/seqlock.h>
+# include <linux/math64.h>
 #endif
 
 #ifndef _STRUCT_TIMESPEC
@@ -172,15 +173,7 @@ extern struct timeval ns_to_timeval(const s64 nsec);
  */
 static inline void timespec_add_ns(struct timespec *a, u64 ns)
 {
-        ns += a->tv_nsec;
-        while(unlikely(ns >= NSEC_PER_SEC)) {
-                /* The following asm() prevents the compiler from
-                 * optimising this loop into a modulo operation.  */
-                asm("" : "+r"(ns));
-
-                ns -= NSEC_PER_SEC;
-                a->tv_sec++;
-        }
+        a->tv_sec += iter_div_u64_rem(a->tv_nsec + ns, NSEC_PER_SEC, &ns);
         a->tv_nsec = ns;
 }
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */