[PATCH] pm: fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in cpufreq

Fix u32 vs pm_message_t confusion in cpufreq.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Blackham <bernard@blackham.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 927daa86c9b3..ff7f80f48df1 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
 
         /* optional */
         int     (*exit)         (struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
-        int     (*suspend)      (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u32 state);
+        int     (*suspend)      (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, pm_message_t pmsg);
         int     (*resume)       (struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
         struct freq_attr        **attr;
 };