aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/utime.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChen, Kenneth W <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>2006-02-14 16:53:10 -0500
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>2006-02-14 19:09:34 -0500
commitd6077cb80cde4506720f9165eba99ee07438513f (patch)
treef4462e51cf0a14a113c0c524711636c8429424bb /include/linux/utime.h
parentf822566165dd46ff5de9bf895cfa6c51f53bb0c4 (diff)
[PATCH] sched: revert "filter affine wakeups"
Revert commit d7102e95b7b9c00277562c29aad421d2d521c5f6: [PATCH] sched: filter affine wakeups Apparently caused more than 10% performance regression for aim7 benchmark. The setup in use is 16-cpu HP rx8620, 64Gb of memory and 12 MSA1000s with 144 disks. Each disk is 72Gb with a single ext3 filesystem (courtesy of HP, who supplied benchmark results). The problem is, for aim7, the wake-up pattern is random, but it still needs load balancing action in the wake-up path to achieve best performance. With the above commit, lack of load balancing hurts that workload. However, for workloads like database transaction processing, the requirement is exactly opposite. In the wake up path, best performance is achieved with absolutely zero load balancing. We simply wake up the process on the CPU that it was previously run. Worst performance is obtained when we do load balancing at wake up. There isn't an easy way to auto detect the workload characteristics. Ingo's earlier patch that detects idle CPU and decide whether to load balance or not doesn't perform with aim7 either since all CPUs are busy (it causes even bigger perf. regression). Revert commit d7102e95b7b9c00277562c29aad421d2d521c5f6, which causes more than 10% performance regression with aim7. Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/utime.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions