PM: Add convenience macro to make switching to dev_pm_ops less error-prone

In a number of cases, the .suspend, .freeze, .poweroff and .resume,
.thaw, .restore functions are identical. However, they all need to be
assigned to avoid regressionsm as the previous code called .suspend
resp. .resume in all those cases. SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS helps to deal
with this case.

[rjw: Changed the name of the macro and added the comment explaining its
 purpose.]

Signed-off-by: Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
index 2b6e20df0e52..3b7e04b95bd2 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm.h
@@ -213,6 +213,20 @@ struct dev_pm_ops {
         int (*runtime_idle)(struct device *dev);
 };
 
+/*
+ * Use this if you want to use the same suspend and resume callbacks for suspend
+ * to RAM and hibernation.
+ */
+#define SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(name, suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
+struct dev_pm_ops name = { \
+        .suspend = suspend_fn, \
+        .resume = resume_fn, \
+        .freeze = suspend_fn, \
+        .thaw = resume_fn, \
+        .poweroff = suspend_fn, \
+        .restore = resume_fn, \
+}
+
 /**
  * PM_EVENT_ messages
  *