[PATCH] x86_64: Remove alternative_smp

The .fill causes miscompilations with some binutils version.

Instead just patch the lock prefix in the lock constructs. That is the
majority of the cost and should be good enough.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h b/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h
index 8d3421996f94..248a79f0eaff 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 
 #define __raw_spin_lock_string \
         "\n1:\t" \
-        "lock ; decl %0\n\t" \
+        LOCK_PREFIX " ; decl %0\n\t" \
         "js 2f\n" \
         LOCK_SECTION_START("") \
         "2:\t" \
@@ -40,10 +40,7 @@
 
 static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
-        alternative_smp(
-                __raw_spin_lock_string,
-                __raw_spin_lock_string_up,
-                "=m" (lock->slock) : : "memory");
+        asm volatile(__raw_spin_lock_string : "=m" (lock->slock) : : "memory");
 }
 
 #define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) __raw_spin_lock(lock)
@@ -125,12 +122,12 @@ static inline int __raw_write_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
 
 static inline void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
-        asm volatile("lock ; incl %0" :"=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+        asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " ; incl %0" :"=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
-        asm volatile("lock ; addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ",%0"
+        asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " ; addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ",%0"
                                 : "=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
 }