[PATCH] visws build fix

Fix this:

> Subject    : CONFIG_X86_VISWS=3Dy, CONFIG_SMP=3Dn compile error
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/7/51
> Submitter  : Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
> Caused-By  : David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>              commit 7d12e780e003f93433d49ce78cfedf4b4c52adc5
> Status     : unknown

Via undescribed means.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Panin <pazke@donpac.ru>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 53 deletions

diff --git a/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h b/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 21cd696d4d0f..000000000000
--- a/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-/* defines for inline arch setup functions */
-
-#include <asm/fixmap.h>
-#include <asm/i8259.h>
-#include "cobalt.h"
-
-static inline void do_timer_interrupt_hook(void)
-{
-        /* Clear the interrupt */
-        co_cpu_write(CO_CPU_STAT,co_cpu_read(CO_CPU_STAT) & ~CO_STAT_TIMEINTR);
-
-        do_timer(1);
-#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
-        update_process_times(user_mode_vm(irq_regs));
-#endif
-/*
- * In the SMP case we use the local APIC timer interrupt to do the
- * profiling, except when we simulate SMP mode on a uniprocessor
- * system, in that case we have to call the local interrupt handler.
- */
-#ifndef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
-        profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING);
-#else
-        if (!using_apic_timer)
-                smp_local_timer_interrupt();
-#endif
-}
-
-static inline int do_timer_overflow(int count)
-{
-        int i;
-
-        spin_lock(&i8259A_lock);
-        /*
-         * This is tricky when I/O APICs are used;
-         * see do_timer_interrupt().
-         */
-        i = inb(0x20);
-        spin_unlock(&i8259A_lock);
-        
-        /* assumption about timer being IRQ0 */
-        if (i & 0x01) {
-                /*
-                 * We cannot detect lost timer interrupts ... 
-                 * well, that's why we call them lost, don't we? :)
-                 * [hmm, on the Pentium and Alpha we can ... sort of]
-                 */
-                count -= LATCH;
-        } else {
-                printk("do_slow_gettimeoffset(): hardware timer problem?\n");
-        }
-        return count;
-}