[PATCH] mm: tlb_is_full_mm was obscure

tlb_is_full_mm?  What does that mean?  The TLB is full?  No, it means that the
mm's last user has gone and the whole mm is being torn down.  And it's an
inline function because sparc64 uses a different (slightly better)
"tlb_frozen" name for the flag others call "fullmm".

And now the ptep_get_and_clear_full macro used in zap_pte_range refers
directly to tlb->fullmm, which would be wrong for sparc64.  Rather than
correct that, I'd prefer to scrap tlb_is_full_mm altogether, and change
sparc64 to just use the same poor name as everyone else - is that okay?

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/include/asm-arm26/tlb.h b/include/asm-arm26/tlb.h
index 8486b00a6799..c7d54ca0a239 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm26/tlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm26/tlb.h
@@ -55,13 +55,6 @@ tlb_finish_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
         put_cpu_var(mmu_gathers);
 }
 
-
-static inline unsigned int
-tlb_is_full_mm(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
-{
-     return tlb->fullmm;
-}
-
 #define tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb,ptep,address)  do { } while (0)
 //#define tlb_start_vma(tlb,vma)                  do { } while (0)
 //FIXME - ARM32 uses this now that things changed in the kernel. seems like it may be pointless on arm26, however to get things compiling...