dlm: use fixed errno values in messages

Some errno values differ across platforms. So if we return things like
-EINPROGRESS from one node it can get misinterpreted or rejected on
another one.

This patch fixes up the errno values passed on the wire so that they
match the x86 ones (so as not to break the protocol), and re-instates
the platform-specific ones at the other end.

Many thanks to Fabio for testing this patch.
Initial patch from Patrick.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio M. Di Nitto <fabbione@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 55 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/dlm/util.c b/fs/dlm/util.c
index 38dcfeb9c4b7..11c6a456309f 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/util.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/util.c
@@ -14,6 +14,14 @@
 #include "rcom.h"
 #include "util.h"
 
+#define DLM_ERRNO_EDEADLK               35
+#define DLM_ERRNO_EBADR                 53
+#define DLM_ERRNO_EBADSLT               57
+#define DLM_ERRNO_EPROTO                71
+#define DLM_ERRNO_EOPNOTSUPP            95
+#define DLM_ERRNO_ETIMEDOUT            110
+#define DLM_ERRNO_EINPROGRESS          115
+
 static void header_out(struct dlm_header *hd)
 {
         hd->h_version           = cpu_to_le32(hd->h_version);
@@ -30,6 +38,51 @@ static void header_in(struct dlm_header *hd)
         hd->h_length            = le16_to_cpu(hd->h_length);
 }
 
+/* higher errno values are inconsistent across architectures, so select
+   one set of values for on the wire */
+
+static int to_dlm_errno(int err)
+{
+        switch (err) {
+        case -EDEADLK:
+                return -DLM_ERRNO_EDEADLK;
+        case -EBADR:
+                return -DLM_ERRNO_EBADR;
+        case -EBADSLT:
+                return -DLM_ERRNO_EBADSLT;
+        case -EPROTO:
+                return -DLM_ERRNO_EPROTO;
+        case -EOPNOTSUPP:
+                return -DLM_ERRNO_EOPNOTSUPP;
+        case -ETIMEDOUT:
+                return -DLM_ERRNO_ETIMEDOUT;
+        case -EINPROGRESS:
+                return -DLM_ERRNO_EINPROGRESS;
+        }
+        return err;
+}
+
+static int from_dlm_errno(int err)
+{
+        switch (err) {
+        case -DLM_ERRNO_EDEADLK:
+                return -EDEADLK;
+        case -DLM_ERRNO_EBADR:
+                return -EBADR;
+        case -DLM_ERRNO_EBADSLT:
+                return -EBADSLT;
+        case -DLM_ERRNO_EPROTO:
+                return -EPROTO;
+        case -DLM_ERRNO_EOPNOTSUPP:
+                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+        case -DLM_ERRNO_ETIMEDOUT:
+                return -ETIMEDOUT;
+        case -DLM_ERRNO_EINPROGRESS:
+                return -EINPROGRESS;
+        }
+        return err;
+}
+
 void dlm_message_out(struct dlm_message *ms)
 {
         struct dlm_header *hd = (struct dlm_header *) ms;
@@ -53,7 +106,7 @@ void dlm_message_out(struct dlm_message *ms)
         ms->m_rqmode            = cpu_to_le32(ms->m_rqmode);
         ms->m_bastmode          = cpu_to_le32(ms->m_bastmode);
         ms->m_asts              = cpu_to_le32(ms->m_asts);
-        ms->m_result            = cpu_to_le32(ms->m_result);
+        ms->m_result            = cpu_to_le32(to_dlm_errno(ms->m_result));
 }
 
 void dlm_message_in(struct dlm_message *ms)
@@ -79,7 +132,7 @@ void dlm_message_in(struct dlm_message *ms)
         ms->m_rqmode            = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_rqmode);
         ms->m_bastmode          = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_bastmode);
         ms->m_asts              = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_asts);
-        ms->m_result            = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_result);
+        ms->m_result            = from_dlm_errno(le32_to_cpu(ms->m_result));
 }
 
 static void rcom_lock_out(struct rcom_lock *rl)