diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2008-02-11 12:19:47 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2008-02-11 12:19:47 -0500 |
commit | 0c0d61ca93d111c521182c0909e478fa709e05c6 (patch) | |
tree | be690362142ec79a673f85d7b2b7323102fab6f8 /fs | |
parent | eedcdefb1ad75de9cc0889b247524be64cc244ef (diff) | |
parent | bb50c8012cbd85b8e105584b32e4d5a2d335dcef (diff) |
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux
* 'for-linus' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux:
SUNPRC: Fix printk format warning
nfsd: clean up svc_reserve_auth()
NLM: don't requeue block if it was invalidated while GRANT_MSG was in flight
NLM: don't reattempt GRANT_MSG when there is already an RPC in flight
NLM: have server-side RPC clients default to soft RPC tasks
NLM: set RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NOPING for NLM RPC clients
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/lockd/host.c | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/lockd/svclock.c | 28 |
2 files changed, 33 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/lockd/host.c b/fs/lockd/host.c index ca6b16fc3101..f1ef49fff118 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/host.c +++ b/fs/lockd/host.c | |||
@@ -243,10 +243,18 @@ nlm_bind_host(struct nlm_host *host) | |||
243 | .program = &nlm_program, | 243 | .program = &nlm_program, |
244 | .version = host->h_version, | 244 | .version = host->h_version, |
245 | .authflavor = RPC_AUTH_UNIX, | 245 | .authflavor = RPC_AUTH_UNIX, |
246 | .flags = (RPC_CLNT_CREATE_HARDRTRY | | 246 | .flags = (RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NOPING | |
247 | RPC_CLNT_CREATE_AUTOBIND), | 247 | RPC_CLNT_CREATE_AUTOBIND), |
248 | }; | 248 | }; |
249 | 249 | ||
250 | /* | ||
251 | * lockd retries server side blocks automatically so we want | ||
252 | * those to be soft RPC calls. Client side calls need to be | ||
253 | * hard RPC tasks. | ||
254 | */ | ||
255 | if (!host->h_server) | ||
256 | args.flags |= RPC_CLNT_CREATE_HARDRTRY; | ||
257 | |||
250 | clnt = rpc_create(&args); | 258 | clnt = rpc_create(&args); |
251 | if (!IS_ERR(clnt)) | 259 | if (!IS_ERR(clnt)) |
252 | host->h_rpcclnt = clnt; | 260 | host->h_rpcclnt = clnt; |
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c index 2f4d8fa66689..fe9bdb4a220c 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c | |||
@@ -763,11 +763,20 @@ callback: | |||
763 | dprintk("lockd: GRANTing blocked lock.\n"); | 763 | dprintk("lockd: GRANTing blocked lock.\n"); |
764 | block->b_granted = 1; | 764 | block->b_granted = 1; |
765 | 765 | ||
766 | /* Schedule next grant callback in 30 seconds */ | 766 | /* keep block on the list, but don't reattempt until the RPC |
767 | nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 30 * HZ); | 767 | * completes or the submission fails |
768 | */ | ||
769 | nlmsvc_insert_block(block, NLM_NEVER); | ||
770 | |||
771 | /* Call the client -- use a soft RPC task since nlmsvc_retry_blocked | ||
772 | * will queue up a new one if this one times out | ||
773 | */ | ||
774 | error = nlm_async_call(block->b_call, NLMPROC_GRANTED_MSG, | ||
775 | &nlmsvc_grant_ops); | ||
768 | 776 | ||
769 | /* Call the client */ | 777 | /* RPC submission failed, wait a bit and retry */ |
770 | nlm_async_call(block->b_call, NLMPROC_GRANTED_MSG, &nlmsvc_grant_ops); | 778 | if (error < 0) |
779 | nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 10 * HZ); | ||
771 | } | 780 | } |
772 | 781 | ||
773 | /* | 782 | /* |
@@ -786,6 +795,17 @@ static void nlmsvc_grant_callback(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) | |||
786 | 795 | ||
787 | dprintk("lockd: GRANT_MSG RPC callback\n"); | 796 | dprintk("lockd: GRANT_MSG RPC callback\n"); |
788 | 797 | ||
798 | /* if the block is not on a list at this point then it has | ||
799 | * been invalidated. Don't try to requeue it. | ||
800 | * | ||
801 | * FIXME: it's possible that the block is removed from the list | ||
802 | * after this check but before the nlmsvc_insert_block. In that | ||
803 | * case it will be added back. Perhaps we need better locking | ||
804 | * for nlm_blocked? | ||
805 | */ | ||
806 | if (list_empty(&block->b_list)) | ||
807 | return; | ||
808 | |||
789 | /* Technically, we should down the file semaphore here. Since we | 809 | /* Technically, we should down the file semaphore here. Since we |
790 | * move the block towards the head of the queue only, no harm | 810 | * move the block towards the head of the queue only, no harm |
791 | * can be done, though. */ | 811 | * can be done, though. */ |