ocfs2: __ocfs2_mark_extent_written() doesn't need struct inode.

We only allow unwritten extents on data, so the toplevel
ocfs2_mark_extent_written() can use an inode all it wants.  But the
subfunction isn't even using the inode argument.

Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 7b0f2cd9f66f..4488685a7022 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -5026,9 +5026,8 @@ out:
  * have been brought into cache (and pinned via the journal), so the
  * extra overhead is not expressed in terms of disk reads.
  */
-static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
+static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(handle_t *handle,
                                        struct ocfs2_extent_tree *et,
-                                       handle_t *handle,
                                        struct ocfs2_path *path,
                                        int split_index,
                                        struct ocfs2_extent_rec *split_rec,
@@ -5062,7 +5061,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
 
         /*
          * The core merge / split code wants to know how much room is
-         * left in this inodes allocation tree, so we pass the
+         * left in this allocation tree, so we pass the
          * rightmost extent list.
          */
         if (path->p_tree_depth) {
@@ -5185,7 +5184,7 @@ int ocfs2_mark_extent_written(struct inode *inode,
         split_rec.e_flags = path_leaf_el(left_path)->l_recs[index].e_flags;
         split_rec.e_flags &= ~OCFS2_EXT_UNWRITTEN;
 
-        ret = __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(inode, et, handle, left_path,
+        ret = __ocfs2_mark_extent_written(handle, et, left_path,
                                           index, &split_rec, meta_ac,
                                           dealloc);
         if (ret)