udf: Do not decrement i_blocks when freeing indirect extent block

Indirect extent block is not accounted in i_blocks during allocation
thus we should not decrement i_blocks when we are freeing such block
during truncation.

Reported-by: Steve Nickel <snickel58@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/udf/truncate.c b/fs/udf/truncate.c
index 4b98fee8e161..8a9657d7f7c6 100644
--- a/fs/udf/truncate.c
+++ b/fs/udf/truncate.c
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void udf_truncate_extents(struct inode *inode)
                                 /* We managed to free all extents in the
                                  * indirect extent - free it too */
                                 BUG_ON(!epos.bh);
-                                udf_free_blocks(sb, inode, &epos.block,
+                                udf_free_blocks(sb, NULL, &epos.block,
                                                 0, indirect_ext_len);
                         } else if (!epos.bh) {
                                 iinfo->i_lenAlloc = lenalloc;
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ void udf_truncate_extents(struct inode *inode)
 
         if (indirect_ext_len) {
                 BUG_ON(!epos.bh);
-                udf_free_blocks(sb, inode, &epos.block, 0, indirect_ext_len);
+                udf_free_blocks(sb, NULL, &epos.block, 0, indirect_ext_len);
         } else if (!epos.bh) {
                 iinfo->i_lenAlloc = lenalloc;
                 mark_inode_dirty(inode);