don't expose I_NEW inodes via dentry->d_inode

	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
	unlock_new_inode(inode);

is a bad idea; do it the other way round...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
index 3916be1a330b..8567fb847601 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
@@ -634,8 +634,8 @@ static int reiserfs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mod
         reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(inode);
         reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(dir);
 
-        d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
         unlock_new_inode(inode);
+        d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
         retval = journal_end(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
 
       out_failed:
@@ -712,8 +712,8 @@ static int reiserfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode
                 goto out_failed;
         }
 
-        d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
         unlock_new_inode(inode);
+        d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
         retval = journal_end(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
 
       out_failed:
@@ -800,8 +800,8 @@ static int reiserfs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode
         // the above add_entry did not update dir's stat data
         reiserfs_update_sd(&th, dir);
 
-        d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
         unlock_new_inode(inode);
+        d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
         retval = journal_end(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
 out_failed:
         reiserfs_write_unlock_once(dir->i_sb, lock_depth);
@@ -1096,8 +1096,8 @@ static int reiserfs_symlink(struct inode *parent_dir,
                 goto out_failed;
         }
 
-        d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
         unlock_new_inode(inode);
+        d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
         retval = journal_end(&th, parent_dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
       out_failed:
         reiserfs_write_unlock(parent_dir->i_sb);