[PATCH] reiserfs: on-demand bitmap loading

This is the patch the three previous ones have been leading up to.

It changes the behavior of ReiserFS from loading and caching all the bitmaps
as special, to treating the bitmaps like any other bit of metadata and just
letting the system-wide caches figure out what to hang on to.

Buffer heads are allocated on the fly, so there is no need to retain pointers
to all of them.  The caching of the metadata occurs when the data is read and
updated, and is considered invalid and uncached until then.

I needed to remove the vs-4040 check for performing a duplicate operation on a
particular bit.  The reason is that while the other sites for working with
bitmaps are allowed to schedule, is_reusable() is called from do_balance(),
which will panic if a schedule occurs in certain places.

The benefit of on-demand bitmaps clearly outweighs a sanity check that depends
on a compile-time option that is discouraged.

[akpm@osdl.org: warning fix]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: <reiserfs-dev@namesys.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 44 insertions, 53 deletions

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c b/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
index abdd6d9c4558..cca1dbf5458f 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ static inline void get_bit_address(struct super_block *s,
 int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b_blocknr_t block, int bit_value)
 {
         int bmap, offset;
-        struct buffer_head *bh;
 
         if (block == 0 || block >= SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s)) {
                 reiserfs_warning(s,
@@ -98,22 +97,6 @@ int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b_blocknr_t block, int bit_value)
                 return 0;
         }
 
-        bh = SB_AP_BITMAP(s)[bmap].bh;
-        get_bh(bh);
-
-        if ((bit_value == 0 && reiserfs_test_le_bit(offset, bh->b_data)) ||
-            (bit_value == 1 && reiserfs_test_le_bit(offset, bh->b_data) == 0)) {
-                reiserfs_warning(s,
-                                 "vs-4040: is_reusable: corresponding bit of block %lu does not "
-                                 "match required value (bmap==%d, offset==%d) test_bit==%d",
-                                 block, bmap, offset,
-                                 reiserfs_test_le_bit(offset, bh->b_data));
-
-                brelse(bh);
-                return 0;
-        }
-        brelse(bh);
-
         if (bit_value == 0 && block == SB_ROOT_BLOCK(s)) {
                 reiserfs_warning(s,
                                  "vs-4050: is_reusable: this is root block (%u), "
@@ -173,13 +156,10 @@ static int scan_bitmap_block(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
                                  bmap_n);
                 return 0;
         }
-        bh = bi->bh;
-        get_bh(bh);
 
-        if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
-                PROC_INFO_INC(s, scan_bitmap.wait);
-                __wait_on_buffer(bh);
-        }
+        bh = reiserfs_read_bitmap_block(s, bmap_n);
+        if (bh == NULL)
+                return 0;
 
         while (1) {
               cont:
@@ -285,9 +265,20 @@ static int bmap_hash_id(struct super_block *s, u32 id)
  */
 static inline int block_group_used(struct super_block *s, u32 id)
 {
-        int bm;
-        bm = bmap_hash_id(s, id);
-        if (SB_AP_BITMAP(s)[bm].free_count > ((s->s_blocksize << 3) * 60 / 100)) {
+        int bm = bmap_hash_id(s, id);
+        struct reiserfs_bitmap_info *info = &SB_AP_BITMAP(s)[bm];
+
+        /* If we don't have cached information on this bitmap block, we're
+         * going to have to load it later anyway. Loading it here allows us
+         * to make a better decision. This favors long-term performace gain
+         * with a better on-disk layout vs. a short term gain of skipping the
+         * read and potentially having a bad placement. */
+        if (info->first_zero_hint == 0) {
+                struct buffer_head *bh = reiserfs_read_bitmap_block(s, bm);
+                brelse(bh);
+        }
+
+        if (info->free_count > ((s->s_blocksize << 3) * 60 / 100)) {
                 return 0;
         }
         return 1;
@@ -413,8 +404,9 @@ static void _reiserfs_free_block(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
                 return;
         }
 
-        bmbh = apbi[nr].bh;
-        get_bh(bmbh);
+        bmbh = reiserfs_read_bitmap_block(s, nr);
+        if (!bmbh)
+                return;
 
         reiserfs_prepare_for_journal(s, bmbh, 1);
 
@@ -1320,6 +1312,7 @@ struct buffer_head *reiserfs_read_bitmap_block(struct super_block *sb,
                                                unsigned int bitmap)
 {
         b_blocknr_t block = (sb->s_blocksize << 3) * bitmap;
+        struct reiserfs_bitmap_info *info = SB_AP_BITMAP(sb) + bitmap;
         struct buffer_head *bh;
 
         /* Way old format filesystems had the bitmaps packed up front.
@@ -1330,9 +1323,21 @@ struct buffer_head *reiserfs_read_bitmap_block(struct super_block *sb,
         else if (bitmap == 0)
                 block = (REISERFS_DISK_OFFSET_IN_BYTES >> sb->s_blocksize_bits) + 1;
 
-        bh = sb_getblk(sb, block);
-        if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
-                ll_rw_block(READ, 1, &bh);
+        bh = sb_bread(sb, block);
+        if (bh == NULL)
+                reiserfs_warning(sb, "sh-2029: %s: bitmap block (#%lu) "
+                                 "reading failed", __FUNCTION__, bh->b_blocknr);
+        else {
+                if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
+                        PROC_INFO_INC(sb, scan_bitmap.wait);
+                        __wait_on_buffer(bh);
+                }
+                BUG_ON(!buffer_uptodate(bh));
+                BUG_ON(atomic_read(&bh->b_count) == 0);
+
+                if (info->first_zero_hint == 0)
+                        reiserfs_cache_bitmap_metadata(sb, bh, info);
+        }
 
         return bh;
 }
@@ -1340,7 +1345,6 @@ struct buffer_head *reiserfs_read_bitmap_block(struct super_block *sb,
 int reiserfs_init_bitmap_cache(struct super_block *sb)
 {
         struct reiserfs_bitmap_info *bitmap;
-        int i;
 
         bitmap = vmalloc(sizeof (*bitmap) * SB_BMAP_NR(sb));
         if (bitmap == NULL)
@@ -1348,28 +1352,15 @@ int reiserfs_init_bitmap_cache(struct super_block *sb)
 
         memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof (*bitmap) * SB_BMAP_NR(sb));
 
-        for (i = 0; i < SB_BMAP_NR(sb); i++)
-                bitmap[i].bh = reiserfs_read_bitmap_block(sb, i);
-
-        /* make sure we have them all */
-        for (i = 0; i < SB_BMAP_NR(sb); i++) {
-                wait_on_buffer(bitmap[i].bh);
-                if (!buffer_uptodate(bitmap[i].bh)) {
-                        reiserfs_warning(sb, "sh-2029: %s: "
-                                         "bitmap block (#%lu) reading failed",
-                                         __FUNCTION__, bitmap[i].bh->b_blocknr);
-                        for (i = 0; i < SB_BMAP_NR(sb); i++)
-                                brelse(bitmap[i].bh);
-                        vfree(bitmap);
-                        return -EIO;
-                }
-        }
-
-        /* Cache the info on the bitmaps before we get rolling */
-        for (i = 0; i < SB_BMAP_NR(sb); i++)
-                reiserfs_cache_bitmap_metadata(sb, bitmap[i].bh, &bitmap[i]);
-
         SB_AP_BITMAP(sb) = bitmap;
 
         return 0;
 }
+
+void reiserfs_free_bitmap_cache(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+        if (SB_AP_BITMAP(sb)) {
+                vfree(SB_AP_BITMAP(sb));
+                SB_AP_BITMAP(sb) = NULL;
+        }
+}