[PATCH] fs/ntfs: Conversion to generic boolean

Conversion of booleans to: generic-boolean.patch (2006-08-23)

Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>
Signed-off-by: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 29 insertions, 29 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ntfs/mft.c b/fs/ntfs/mft.c
index 584260fd6848..2ad5c8b104b9 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/mft.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/mft.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ MFT_RECORD *map_extent_mft_record(ntfs_inode *base_ni, MFT_REF mref,
         int i;
         unsigned long mft_no = MREF(mref);
         u16 seq_no = MSEQNO(mref);
-        BOOL destroy_ni = FALSE;
+        bool destroy_ni = false;
 
         ntfs_debug("Mapping extent mft record 0x%lx (base mft record 0x%lx).",
                         mft_no, base_ni->mft_no);
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ map_err_out:
         if (seq_no && (le16_to_cpu(m->sequence_number) != seq_no)) {
                 ntfs_error(base_ni->vol->sb, "Found stale extent mft "
                                 "reference! Corrupt filesystem. Run chkdsk.");
-                destroy_ni = TRUE;
+                destroy_ni = true;
                 m = ERR_PTR(-EIO);
                 goto unm_err_out;
         }
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ map_err_out:
                 if (unlikely(!tmp)) {
                         ntfs_error(base_ni->vol->sb, "Failed to allocate "
                                         "internal buffer.");
-                        destroy_ni = TRUE;
+                        destroy_ni = true;
                         m = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
                         goto unm_err_out;
                 }
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ err_out:
  * caller is responsible for unlocking the ntfs inode and unpinning the base
  * vfs inode.
  *
- * Return TRUE if the mft record may be written out and FALSE if not.
+ * Return 'true' if the mft record may be written out and 'false' if not.
  *
  * The caller has locked the page and cleared the uptodate flag on it which
  * means that we can safely write out any dirty mft records that do not have
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ err_out:
  * Here is a description of the tests we perform:
  *
  * If the inode is found in icache we know the mft record must be a base mft
- * record.  If it is dirty, we do not write it and return FALSE as the vfs
+ * record.  If it is dirty, we do not write it and return 'false' as the vfs
  * inode write paths will result in the access times being updated which would
  * cause the base mft record to be redirtied and written out again.  (We know
  * the access time update will modify the base mft record because Windows
@@ -877,11 +877,11 @@ err_out:
  *
  * If the inode is in icache and not dirty, we attempt to lock the mft record
  * and if we find the lock was already taken, it is not safe to write the mft
- * record and we return FALSE.
+ * record and we return 'false'.
  *
  * If we manage to obtain the lock we have exclusive access to the mft record,
  * which also allows us safe writeout of the mft record.  We then set
- * @locked_ni to the locked ntfs inode and return TRUE.
+ * @locked_ni to the locked ntfs inode and return 'true'.
  *
  * Note we cannot just lock the mft record and sleep while waiting for the lock
  * because this would deadlock due to lock reversal (normally the mft record is
@@ -891,24 +891,24 @@ err_out:
  * If the inode is not in icache we need to perform further checks.
  *
  * If the mft record is not a FILE record or it is a base mft record, we can
- * safely write it and return TRUE.
+ * safely write it and return 'true'.
  *
  * We now know the mft record is an extent mft record.  We check if the inode
  * corresponding to its base mft record is in icache and obtain a reference to
- * it if it is.  If it is not, we can safely write it and return TRUE.
+ * it if it is.  If it is not, we can safely write it and return 'true'.
  *
  * We now have the base inode for the extent mft record.  We check if it has an
  * ntfs inode for the extent mft record attached and if not it is safe to write
- * the extent mft record and we return TRUE.
+ * the extent mft record and we return 'true'.
  *
  * The ntfs inode for the extent mft record is attached to the base inode so we
  * attempt to lock the extent mft record and if we find the lock was already
- * taken, it is not safe to write the extent mft record and we return FALSE.
+ * taken, it is not safe to write the extent mft record and we return 'false'.
  *
  * If we manage to obtain the lock we have exclusive access to the extent mft
  * record, which also allows us safe writeout of the extent mft record.  We
  * set the ntfs inode of the extent mft record clean and then set @locked_ni to
- * the now locked ntfs inode and return TRUE.
+ * the now locked ntfs inode and return 'true'.
  *
  * Note, the reason for actually writing dirty mft records here and not just
  * relying on the vfs inode dirty code paths is that we can have mft records
@@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ err_out:
  * appear if the mft record is reused for a new inode before it got written
  * out.
  */
-BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
+bool ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
                 const MFT_RECORD *m, ntfs_inode **locked_ni)
 {
         struct super_block *sb = vol->sb;
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
                                         mft_no);
                         atomic_dec(&ni->count);
                         iput(vi);
-                        return FALSE;
+                        return false;
                 }
                 ntfs_debug("Inode 0x%lx is not dirty.", mft_no);
                 /* The inode is not dirty, try to take the mft record lock. */
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
                                         "not write it.", mft_no);
                         atomic_dec(&ni->count);
                         iput(vi);
-                        return FALSE;
+                        return false;
                 }
                 ntfs_debug("Managed to lock mft record 0x%lx, write it.",
                                 mft_no);
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
                  * return the locked ntfs inode.
                  */
                 *locked_ni = ni;
-                return TRUE;
+                return true;
         }
         ntfs_debug("Inode 0x%lx is not in icache.", mft_no);
         /* The inode is not in icache. */
@@ -1003,13 +1003,13 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
         if (!ntfs_is_mft_record(m->magic)) {
                 ntfs_debug("Mft record 0x%lx is not a FILE record, write it.",
                                 mft_no);
-                return TRUE;
+                return true;
         }
         /* Write the mft record if it is a base inode. */
         if (!m->base_mft_record) {
                 ntfs_debug("Mft record 0x%lx is a base record, write it.",
                                 mft_no);
-                return TRUE;
+                return true;
         }
         /*
          * This is an extent mft record.  Check if the inode corresponding to
@@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
                  */
                 ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx is not in icache, write the "
                                 "extent record.", na.mft_no);
-                return TRUE;
+                return true;
         }
         ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx is in icache.", na.mft_no);
         /*
@@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
                 iput(vi);
                 ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx has no attached extent inodes, "
                                 "write the extent record.", na.mft_no);
-                return TRUE;
+                return true;
         }
         /* Iterate over the attached extent inodes. */
         extent_nis = ni->ext.extent_ntfs_inos;
@@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
                 ntfs_debug("Extent inode 0x%lx is not attached to its base "
                                 "inode 0x%lx, write the extent record.",
                                 mft_no, na.mft_no);
-                return TRUE;
+                return true;
         }
         ntfs_debug("Extent inode 0x%lx is attached to its base inode 0x%lx.",
                         mft_no, na.mft_no);
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
                 iput(vi);
                 ntfs_debug("Extent mft record 0x%lx is already locked, do "
                                 "not write it.", mft_no);
-                return FALSE;
+                return false;
         }
         ntfs_debug("Managed to lock extent mft record 0x%lx, write it.",
                         mft_no);
@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
          * the locked extent ntfs inode.
          */
         *locked_ni = eni;
-        return TRUE;
+        return true;
 }
 
 static const char *es = "  Leaving inconsistent metadata.  Unmount and run "
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_bitmap_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol)
                 ntfs_unmap_page(page);
                 /* Allocate a cluster from the DATA_ZONE. */
                 rl2 = ntfs_cluster_alloc(vol, rl[1].vcn, 1, lcn, DATA_ZONE,
-                                TRUE);
+                                true);
                 if (IS_ERR(rl2)) {
                         up_write(&mftbmp_ni->runlist.lock);
                         ntfs_error(vol->sb, "Failed to allocate a cluster for "
@@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol)
         ATTR_RECORD *a = NULL;
         int ret, mp_size;
         u32 old_alen = 0;
-        BOOL mp_rebuilt = FALSE;
+        bool mp_rebuilt = false;
 
         ntfs_debug("Extending mft data allocation.");
         mft_ni = NTFS_I(vol->mft_ino);
@@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol)
         old_last_vcn = rl[1].vcn;
         do {
                 rl2 = ntfs_cluster_alloc(vol, old_last_vcn, nr, lcn, MFT_ZONE,
-                                TRUE);
+                                true);
                 if (likely(!IS_ERR(rl2)))
                         break;
                 if (PTR_ERR(rl2) != -ENOSPC || nr == min_nr) {
@@ -1884,7 +1884,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol)
                 ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
                 goto undo_alloc;
         }
-        mp_rebuilt = TRUE;
+        mp_rebuilt = true;
         /* Generate the mapping pairs array directly into the attr record. */
         ret = ntfs_mapping_pairs_build(vol, (u8*)a +
                         le16_to_cpu(a->data.non_resident.mapping_pairs_offset),
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ ntfs_inode *ntfs_mft_record_alloc(ntfs_volume *vol, const int mode,
         unsigned int ofs;
         int err;
         le16 seq_no, usn;
-        BOOL record_formatted = FALSE;
+        bool record_formatted = false;
 
         if (base_ni) {
                 ntfs_debug("Entering (allocating an extent mft record for "
@@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ have_alloc_rec:
                 mft_ni->initialized_size = new_initialized_size;
         }
         write_unlock_irqrestore(&mft_ni->size_lock, flags);
-        record_formatted = TRUE;
+        record_formatted = true;
         /* Update the mft data attribute record to reflect the new sizes. */
         m = map_mft_record(mft_ni);
         if (IS_ERR(m)) {