aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>2010-08-15 07:16:11 -0400
committerRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>2010-08-15 22:08:36 -0400
commitea1a16f7168ac19d974ac51b47593b92280e7992 (patch)
treee16e89f6f8f3a440476bba74a1c28d2f5bc0f5f4 /fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
parentaf4e36318edb848fcc0a8d5f75000ca00cdc7595 (diff)
nilfs2: fix false warning saying one of two super blocks is broken
After applying commit b2ac86e1, the following message got appeared after unclean shutdown: > NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock. This turns out to be a false message due to the change which updates two super blocks alternately. The secondary super block now can be selected if it's newer than the primary one. This kills the false warning by suppressing it if another super block is not actually broken. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
index 37de1f062d81..6af1c0073e9e 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
@@ -608,11 +608,11 @@ static int nilfs_load_super_block(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
608 return -EINVAL; 608 return -EINVAL;
609 } 609 }
610 610
611 if (swp) { 611 if (!valid[!swp])
612 printk(KERN_WARNING "NILFS warning: broken superblock. " 612 printk(KERN_WARNING "NILFS warning: broken superblock. "
613 "using spare superblock.\n"); 613 "using spare superblock.\n");
614 if (swp)
614 nilfs_swap_super_block(nilfs); 615 nilfs_swap_super_block(nilfs);
615 }
616 616
617 nilfs->ns_sbwcount = 0; 617 nilfs->ns_sbwcount = 0;
618 nilfs->ns_sbwtime = le64_to_cpu(sbp[0]->s_wtime); 618 nilfs->ns_sbwtime = le64_to_cpu(sbp[0]->s_wtime);