aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/jfs/jfs_debug.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>2009-03-25 15:48:06 -0400
committerAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>2009-03-30 17:14:44 -0400
commit99b76233803beab302123d243eea9e41149804f3 (patch)
tree398178210fe66845ccd6fa4258ba762a87e023ad /fs/jfs/jfs_debug.c
parent3dec7f59c370c7b58184d63293c3dc984d475840 (diff)
proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner
Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting in module refcount underflow. We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops and ->data. But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment) and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give some thoughts. ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for protection. rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm. And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular. We definitely don't want such modular code. Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller. So, let's nuke it. Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jfs/jfs_debug.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/jfs/jfs_debug.c1
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_debug.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_debug.c
index 6a73de84bcef..dd824d9b0b1a 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_debug.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_debug.c
@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ void jfs_proc_init(void)
90 90
91 if (!(base = proc_mkdir("fs/jfs", NULL))) 91 if (!(base = proc_mkdir("fs/jfs", NULL)))
92 return; 92 return;
93 base->owner = THIS_MODULE;
94 93
95 for (i = 0; i < NPROCENT; i++) 94 for (i = 0; i < NPROCENT; i++)
96 proc_create(Entries[i].name, 0, base, Entries[i].proc_fops); 95 proc_create(Entries[i].name, 0, base, Entries[i].proc_fops);