fs: icache RCU free inodes

RCU free the struct inode. This will allow:

- Subsequent store-free path walking patch. The inode must be consulted for
  permissions when walking, so an RCU inode reference is a must.
- sb_inode_list_lock to be moved inside i_lock because sb list walkers who want
  to take i_lock no longer need to take sb_inode_list_lock to walk the list in
  the first place. This will simplify and optimize locking.
- Could remove some nested trylock loops in dcache code
- Could potentially simplify things a bit in VM land. Do not need to take the
  page lock to follow page->mapping.

The downsides of this is the performance cost of using RCU. In a simple
creat/unlink microbenchmark, performance drops by about 10% due to inability to
reuse cache-hot slab objects. As iterations increase and RCU freeing starts
kicking over, this increases to about 20%.

In cases where inode lifetimes are longer (ie. many inodes may be allocated
during the average life span of a single inode), a lot of this cache reuse is
not applicable, so the regression caused by this patch is smaller.

The cache-hot regression could largely be avoided by using SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
however this adds some complexity to list walking and store-free path walking,
so I prefer to implement this at a later date, if it is shown to be a win in
real situations. I haven't found a regression in any non-micro benchmark so I
doubt it will be a problem.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 5a0a898f55d1..6751dfe8cc06 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -272,6 +272,13 @@ void __destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__destroy_inode);
 
+static void i_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+        struct inode *inode = container_of(head, struct inode, i_rcu);
+        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_dentry);
+        kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, inode);
+}
+
 static void destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
         BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_lru));
@@ -279,7 +286,7 @@ static void destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
         if (inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode)
                 inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode(inode);
         else
-                kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, (inode));
+                call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, i_callback);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -432,6 +439,7 @@ void end_writeback(struct inode *inode)
         BUG_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING));
         BUG_ON(inode->i_state & I_CLEAR);
         inode_sync_wait(inode);
+        /* don't need i_lock here, no concurrent mods to i_state */
         inode->i_state = I_FREEING | I_CLEAR;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(end_writeback);