aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/fs-writeback.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>2008-02-05 01:29:36 -0500
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>2008-02-05 12:44:19 -0500
commit8bc3be2751b4f74ab90a446da1912fd8204d53f7 (patch)
tree2bc514025a906203244d98de70fb6bd87f3ac9ac /fs/fs-writeback.c
parenta322f8ab66f50b6c0dcdb59abae84fede7a5fded (diff)
writeback: speed up writeback of big dirty files
After making dirty a 100M file, the normal behavior is to start the writeback for all data after 30s delays. But sometimes the following happens instead: - after 30s: ~4M - after 5s: ~4M - after 5s: all remaining 92M Some analyze shows that the internal io dispatch queues goes like this: s_io s_more_io ------------------------- 1) 100M,1K 0 2) 1K 96M 3) 0 96M 1) initial state with a 100M file and a 1K file 2) 4M written, nr_to_write <= 0, so write more 3) 1K written, nr_to_write > 0, no more writes(BUG) nr_to_write > 0 in (3) fools the upper layer to think that data have all been written out. The big dirty file is actually still sitting in s_more_io. We cannot simply splice s_more_io back to s_io as soon as s_io becomes empty, and let the loop in generic_sync_sb_inodes() continue: this may starve newly expired inodes in s_dirty. It is also not an option to draw inodes from both s_more_io and s_dirty, an let the loop go on: this might lead to live locks, and might also starve other superblocks in sync time(well kupdate may still starve some superblocks, that's another bug). We have to return when a full scan of s_io completes. So nr_to_write > 0 does not necessarily mean that "all data are written". This patch introduces a flag writeback_control.more_io to indicate that more io should be done. With it the big dirty file no longer has to wait for the next kupdate invokation 5s later. In sync_sb_inodes() we only set more_io on super_blocks we actually visited. This avoids the interaction between two pdflush deamons. Also in __sync_single_inode() we don't blindly keep requeuing the io if the filesystem cannot progress. Failing to do so may lead to 100% iowait. Tested-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fs-writeback.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/fs-writeback.c18
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 3fe782d70a71..0b3064079fa5 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -284,7 +284,17 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
284 * soon as the queue becomes uncongested. 284 * soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
285 */ 285 */
286 inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES; 286 inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
287 requeue_io(inode); 287 if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
288 /*
289 * slice used up: queue for next turn
290 */
291 requeue_io(inode);
292 } else {
293 /*
294 * somehow blocked: retry later
295 */
296 redirty_tail(inode);
297 }
288 } else { 298 } else {
289 /* 299 /*
290 * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that 300 * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
@@ -468,8 +478,12 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
468 iput(inode); 478 iput(inode);
469 cond_resched(); 479 cond_resched();
470 spin_lock(&inode_lock); 480 spin_lock(&inode_lock);
471 if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) 481 if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
482 wbc->more_io = 1;
472 break; 483 break;
484 }
485 if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io))
486 wbc->more_io = 1;
473 } 487 }
474 return; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */ 488 return; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */
475} 489}