diff options
author | Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> | 2008-02-05 01:29:36 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2008-02-05 12:44:19 -0500 |
commit | 8bc3be2751b4f74ab90a446da1912fd8204d53f7 (patch) | |
tree | 2bc514025a906203244d98de70fb6bd87f3ac9ac /fs/fs-writeback.c | |
parent | a322f8ab66f50b6c0dcdb59abae84fede7a5fded (diff) |
writeback: speed up writeback of big dirty files
After making dirty a 100M file, the normal behavior is to start the
writeback for all data after 30s delays. But sometimes the following
happens instead:
- after 30s: ~4M
- after 5s: ~4M
- after 5s: all remaining 92M
Some analyze shows that the internal io dispatch queues goes like this:
s_io s_more_io
-------------------------
1) 100M,1K 0
2) 1K 96M
3) 0 96M
1) initial state with a 100M file and a 1K file
2) 4M written, nr_to_write <= 0, so write more
3) 1K written, nr_to_write > 0, no more writes(BUG)
nr_to_write > 0 in (3) fools the upper layer to think that data have all
been written out. The big dirty file is actually still sitting in
s_more_io. We cannot simply splice s_more_io back to s_io as soon as s_io
becomes empty, and let the loop in generic_sync_sb_inodes() continue: this
may starve newly expired inodes in s_dirty. It is also not an option to
draw inodes from both s_more_io and s_dirty, an let the loop go on: this
might lead to live locks, and might also starve other superblocks in sync
time(well kupdate may still starve some superblocks, that's another bug).
We have to return when a full scan of s_io completes. So nr_to_write > 0
does not necessarily mean that "all data are written". This patch
introduces a flag writeback_control.more_io to indicate that more io should
be done. With it the big dirty file no longer has to wait for the next
kupdate invokation 5s later.
In sync_sb_inodes() we only set more_io on super_blocks we actually
visited. This avoids the interaction between two pdflush deamons.
Also in __sync_single_inode() we don't blindly keep requeuing the io if the
filesystem cannot progress. Failing to do so may lead to 100% iowait.
Tested-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fs-writeback.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/fs-writeback.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 3fe782d70a71..0b3064079fa5 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c | |||
@@ -284,7 +284,17 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc) | |||
284 | * soon as the queue becomes uncongested. | 284 | * soon as the queue becomes uncongested. |
285 | */ | 285 | */ |
286 | inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES; | 286 | inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES; |
287 | requeue_io(inode); | 287 | if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) { |
288 | /* | ||
289 | * slice used up: queue for next turn | ||
290 | */ | ||
291 | requeue_io(inode); | ||
292 | } else { | ||
293 | /* | ||
294 | * somehow blocked: retry later | ||
295 | */ | ||
296 | redirty_tail(inode); | ||
297 | } | ||
288 | } else { | 298 | } else { |
289 | /* | 299 | /* |
290 | * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that | 300 | * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that |
@@ -468,8 +478,12 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc) | |||
468 | iput(inode); | 478 | iput(inode); |
469 | cond_resched(); | 479 | cond_resched(); |
470 | spin_lock(&inode_lock); | 480 | spin_lock(&inode_lock); |
471 | if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) | 481 | if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) { |
482 | wbc->more_io = 1; | ||
472 | break; | 483 | break; |
484 | } | ||
485 | if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io)) | ||
486 | wbc->more_io = 1; | ||
473 | } | 487 | } |
474 | return; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */ | 488 | return; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */ |
475 | } | 489 | } |