eCryptfs: grammatical fix (destruct to destroy)

Andrew Morton wrote:
> > +int ecryptfs_destruct_crypto(void)
>
> ecryptfs_destroy_crypto would be more grammatically correct ;)

Grammatical fix for some function names.

Signed-off-by: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/super.c b/fs/ecryptfs/super.c
index 7b3f0cc09a6f..18d77f8aa7cd 100644
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/super.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void ecryptfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
         struct ecryptfs_inode_info *inode_info;
 
         inode_info = ecryptfs_inode_to_private(inode);
-        ecryptfs_destruct_crypt_stat(&inode_info->crypt_stat);
+        ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat(&inode_info->crypt_stat);
         kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_inode_info_cache, inode_info);
 }
 
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void ecryptfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
 {
         struct ecryptfs_sb_info *sb_info = ecryptfs_superblock_to_private(sb);
 
-        ecryptfs_destruct_mount_crypt_stat(&sb_info->mount_crypt_stat);
+        ecryptfs_destroy_mount_crypt_stat(&sb_info->mount_crypt_stat);
         kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_sb_info_cache, sb_info);
         ecryptfs_set_superblock_private(sb, NULL);
 }