[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock

Full cancel and force-unlock support.  In the past, cancel and force-unlock
wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock.  Now,
both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there
may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel.  This support is
important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations
that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while
holding locks.

Summary of changes:

- add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations
  with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock

- validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force
  can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup
  reply is received

- processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force
  occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force

- manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under
  the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state

- the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed
  according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state

- waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping
  cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks

- revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did
  nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast
  should only be done when cancel did something

- orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging

- cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan

- flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the
  application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force

- we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose
  either a completion or blocking ast

- clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 522 insertions, 188 deletions

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index e725005fafd0..b865a46059dd 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /******************************************************************************
 *******************************************************************************
 **
-**  Copyright (C) 2005 Red Hat, Inc.  All rights reserved.
+**  Copyright (C) 2005-2007 Red Hat, Inc.  All rights reserved.
 **
 **  This copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use,
 **  modify, copy, or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions
@@ -254,6 +254,22 @@ static inline int down_conversion(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
         return (!middle_conversion(lkb) && lkb->lkb_rqmode < lkb->lkb_grmode);
 }
 
+static inline int is_overlap_unlock(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+{
+        return lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+}
+
+static inline int is_overlap_cancel(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+{
+        return lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+}
+
+static inline int is_overlap(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+{
+        return (lkb->lkb_flags & (DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK |
+                                  DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL));
+}
+
 static void queue_cast(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int rv)
 {
         if (is_master_copy(lkb))
@@ -267,6 +283,12 @@ static void queue_cast(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int rv)
         dlm_add_ast(lkb, AST_COMP);
 }
 
+static inline void queue_cast_overlap(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+{
+        queue_cast(r, lkb,
+                   is_overlap_unlock(lkb) ? -DLM_EUNLOCK : -DLM_ECANCEL);
+}
+
 static void queue_bast(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int rqmode)
 {
         if (is_master_copy(lkb))
@@ -547,6 +569,7 @@ static int create_lkb(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb **lkb_ret)
         lkb->lkb_grmode = DLM_LOCK_IV;
         kref_init(&lkb->lkb_ref);
         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue);
+        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lkb->lkb_rsb_lookup);
 
         get_random_bytes(&bucket, sizeof(bucket));
         bucket &= (ls->ls_lkbtbl_size - 1);
@@ -735,23 +758,75 @@ static void move_lkb(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int sts)
         unhold_lkb(lkb);
 }
 
+static int msg_reply_type(int mstype)
+{
+        switch (mstype) {
+        case DLM_MSG_REQUEST:
+                return DLM_MSG_REQUEST_REPLY;
+        case DLM_MSG_CONVERT:
+                return DLM_MSG_CONVERT_REPLY;
+        case DLM_MSG_UNLOCK:
+                return DLM_MSG_UNLOCK_REPLY;
+        case DLM_MSG_CANCEL:
+                return DLM_MSG_CANCEL_REPLY;
+        case DLM_MSG_LOOKUP:
+                return DLM_MSG_LOOKUP_REPLY;
+        }
+        return -1;
+}
+
 /* add/remove lkb from global waiters list of lkb's waiting for
    a reply from a remote node */
 
-static void add_to_waiters(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
+static int add_to_waiters(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
 {
         struct dlm_ls *ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls;
+        int error = 0;
 
         mutex_lock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
-        if (lkb->lkb_wait_type) {
-                log_print("add_to_waiters error %d", lkb->lkb_wait_type);
+
+        if (is_overlap_unlock(lkb) ||
+            (is_overlap_cancel(lkb) && (mstype == DLM_MSG_CANCEL))) {
+                error = -EINVAL;
+                goto out;
+        }
+
+        if (lkb->lkb_wait_type || is_overlap_cancel(lkb)) {
+                switch (mstype) {
+                case DLM_MSG_UNLOCK:
+                        lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+                        break;
+                case DLM_MSG_CANCEL:
+                        lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+                        break;
+                default:
+                        error = -EBUSY;
+                        goto out;
+                }
+                lkb->lkb_wait_count++;
+                hold_lkb(lkb);
+
+                log_debug(ls, "add overlap %x cur %d new %d count %d flags %x",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_wait_type, mstype,
+                          lkb->lkb_wait_count, lkb->lkb_flags);
                 goto out;
         }
+
+        DLM_ASSERT(!lkb->lkb_wait_count,
+                   dlm_print_lkb(lkb);
+                   printk("wait_count %d\n", lkb->lkb_wait_count););
+
+        lkb->lkb_wait_count++;
         lkb->lkb_wait_type = mstype;
-        kref_get(&lkb->lkb_ref);
+        hold_lkb(lkb);
         list_add(&lkb->lkb_wait_reply, &ls->ls_waiters);
  out:
+        if (error)
+                log_error(ls, "add_to_waiters %x error %d flags %x %d %d %s",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, error, lkb->lkb_flags, mstype,
+                          lkb->lkb_wait_type, lkb->lkb_resource->res_name);
         mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
+        return error;
 }
 
 /* We clear the RESEND flag because we might be taking an lkb off the waiters
@@ -759,34 +834,85 @@ static void add_to_waiters(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
    request reply on the requestqueue) between dlm_recover_waiters_pre() which
    set RESEND and dlm_recover_waiters_post() */
 
-static int _remove_from_waiters(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+static int _remove_from_waiters(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
 {
-        int error = 0;
+        struct dlm_ls *ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls;
+        int overlap_done = 0;
 
-        if (!lkb->lkb_wait_type) {
-                log_print("remove_from_waiters error");
-                error = -EINVAL;
-                goto out;
+        if (is_overlap_unlock(lkb) && (mstype == DLM_MSG_UNLOCK_REPLY)) {
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+                overlap_done = 1;
+                goto out_del;
         }
-        lkb->lkb_wait_type = 0;
+
+        if (is_overlap_cancel(lkb) && (mstype == DLM_MSG_CANCEL_REPLY)) {
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+                overlap_done = 1;
+                goto out_del;
+        }
+
+        /* N.B. type of reply may not always correspond to type of original
+           msg due to lookup->request optimization, verify others? */
+
+        if (lkb->lkb_wait_type) {
+                lkb->lkb_wait_type = 0;
+                goto out_del;
+        }
+
+        log_error(ls, "remove_from_waiters lkid %x flags %x types %d %d",
+                  lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_flags, mstype, lkb->lkb_wait_type);
+        return -1;
+
+ out_del:
+        /* the force-unlock/cancel has completed and we haven't recvd a reply
+           to the op that was in progress prior to the unlock/cancel; we
+           give up on any reply to the earlier op.  FIXME: not sure when/how
+           this would happen */
+
+        if (overlap_done && lkb->lkb_wait_type) {
+                log_error(ls, "remove_from_waiters %x reply %d give up on %d",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, mstype, lkb->lkb_wait_type);
+                lkb->lkb_wait_count--;
+                lkb->lkb_wait_type = 0;
+        }
+
+        DLM_ASSERT(lkb->lkb_wait_count, dlm_print_lkb(lkb););
+
         lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_RESEND;
-        list_del(&lkb->lkb_wait_reply);
+        lkb->lkb_wait_count--;
+        if (!lkb->lkb_wait_count)
+                list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_wait_reply);
         unhold_lkb(lkb);
- out:
-        return error;
+        return 0;
 }
 
-static int remove_from_waiters(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+static int remove_from_waiters(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
 {
         struct dlm_ls *ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls;
         int error;
 
         mutex_lock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
-        error = _remove_from_waiters(lkb);
+        error = _remove_from_waiters(lkb, mstype);
         mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
         return error;
 }
 
+/* Handles situations where we might be processing a "fake" or "stub" reply in
+   which we can't try to take waiters_mutex again. */
+
+static int remove_from_waiters_ms(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_message *ms)
+{
+        struct dlm_ls *ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls;
+        int error;
+
+        if (ms != &ls->ls_stub_ms)
+                mutex_lock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
+        error = _remove_from_waiters(lkb, ms->m_type);
+        if (ms != &ls->ls_stub_ms)
+                mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
+        return error;
+}
+
 static void dir_remove(struct dlm_rsb *r)
 {
         int to_nodeid;
@@ -988,8 +1114,14 @@ static void remove_lock_pc(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
         _remove_lock(r, lkb);
 }
 
-static void revert_lock(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+/* returns: 0 did nothing
+            1 moved lock to granted
+           -1 removed lock */
+
+static int revert_lock(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
 {
+        int rv = 0;
+
         lkb->lkb_rqmode = DLM_LOCK_IV;
 
         switch (lkb->lkb_status) {
@@ -997,6 +1129,7 @@ static void revert_lock(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
                 break;
         case DLM_LKSTS_CONVERT:
                 move_lkb(r, lkb, DLM_LKSTS_GRANTED);
+                rv = 1;
                 break;
         case DLM_LKSTS_WAITING:
                 del_lkb(r, lkb);
@@ -1004,15 +1137,17 @@ static void revert_lock(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
                 /* this unhold undoes the original ref from create_lkb()
                    so this leads to the lkb being freed */
                 unhold_lkb(lkb);
+                rv = -1;
                 break;
         default:
                 log_print("invalid status for revert %d", lkb->lkb_status);
         }
+        return rv;
 }
 
-static void revert_lock_pc(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+static int revert_lock_pc(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
 {
-        revert_lock(r, lkb);
+        return revert_lock(r, lkb);
 }
 
 static void _grant_lock(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
@@ -1499,7 +1634,7 @@ static void process_lookup_list(struct dlm_rsb *r)
         struct dlm_lkb *lkb, *safe;
 
         list_for_each_entry_safe(lkb, safe, &r->res_lookup, lkb_rsb_lookup) {
-                list_del(&lkb->lkb_rsb_lookup);
+                list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_rsb_lookup);
                 _request_lock(r, lkb);
                 schedule();
         }
@@ -1530,7 +1665,7 @@ static void confirm_master(struct dlm_rsb *r, int error)
                 if (!list_empty(&r->res_lookup)) {
                         lkb = list_entry(r->res_lookup.next, struct dlm_lkb,
                                          lkb_rsb_lookup);
-                        list_del(&lkb->lkb_rsb_lookup);
+                        list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_rsb_lookup);
                         r->res_first_lkid = lkb->lkb_id;
                         _request_lock(r, lkb);
                 } else
@@ -1614,6 +1749,9 @@ static int set_unlock_args(uint32_t flags, void *astarg, struct dlm_args *args)
                       DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK))
                 return -EINVAL;
 
+        if (flags & DLM_LKF_CANCEL && flags & DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK)
+                return -EINVAL;
+
         args->flags = flags;
         args->astparam = (long) astarg;
         return 0;
@@ -1638,6 +1776,9 @@ static int validate_lock_args(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
 
                 if (lkb->lkb_wait_type)
                         goto out;
+
+                if (is_overlap(lkb))
+                        goto out;
         }
 
         lkb->lkb_exflags = args->flags;
@@ -1654,35 +1795,126 @@ static int validate_lock_args(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
         return rv;
 }
 
+/* when dlm_unlock() sees -EBUSY with CANCEL/FORCEUNLOCK it returns 0
+   for success */
+
+/* note: it's valid for lkb_nodeid/res_nodeid to be -1 when we get here
+   because there may be a lookup in progress and it's valid to do
+   cancel/unlockf on it */
+
 static int validate_unlock_args(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_args *args)
 {
+        struct dlm_ls *ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls;
         int rv = -EINVAL;
 
-        if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_MSTCPY)
+        if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_MSTCPY) {
+                log_error(ls, "unlock on MSTCPY %x", lkb->lkb_id);
+                dlm_print_lkb(lkb);
                 goto out;
+        }
 
-        if (args->flags & DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK)
-                goto out_ok;
+        /* an lkb may still exist even though the lock is EOL'ed due to a
+           cancel, unlock or failed noqueue request; an app can't use these
+           locks; return same error as if the lkid had not been found at all */
 
-        if (args->flags & DLM_LKF_CANCEL &&
-            lkb->lkb_status == DLM_LKSTS_GRANTED)
+        if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_ENDOFLIFE) {
+                log_debug(ls, "unlock on ENDOFLIFE %x", lkb->lkb_id);
+                rv = -ENOENT;
                 goto out;
+        }
 
-        if (!(args->flags & DLM_LKF_CANCEL) &&
-            lkb->lkb_status != DLM_LKSTS_GRANTED)
-                goto out;
+        /* an lkb may be waiting for an rsb lookup to complete where the
+           lookup was initiated by another lock */
+
+        if (args->flags & (DLM_LKF_CANCEL | DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK)) {
+                if (!list_empty(&lkb->lkb_rsb_lookup)) {
+                        log_debug(ls, "unlock on rsb_lookup %x", lkb->lkb_id);
+                        list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_rsb_lookup);
+                        queue_cast(lkb->lkb_resource, lkb,
+                                   args->flags & DLM_LKF_CANCEL ?
+                                   -DLM_ECANCEL : -DLM_EUNLOCK);
+                        unhold_lkb(lkb); /* undoes create_lkb() */
+                        rv = -EBUSY;
+                        goto out;
+                }
+        }
+
+        /* cancel not allowed with another cancel/unlock in progress */
+
+        if (args->flags & DLM_LKF_CANCEL) {
+                if (lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_CANCEL)
+                        goto out;
+
+                if (is_overlap(lkb))
+                        goto out;
+
+                if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_RESEND) {
+                        lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+                        rv = -EBUSY;
+                        goto out;
+                }
+
+                switch (lkb->lkb_wait_type) {
+                case DLM_MSG_LOOKUP:
+                case DLM_MSG_REQUEST:
+                        lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+                        rv = -EBUSY;
+                        goto out;
+                case DLM_MSG_UNLOCK:
+                case DLM_MSG_CANCEL:
+                        goto out;
+                }
+                /* add_to_waiters() will set OVERLAP_CANCEL */
+                goto out_ok;
+        }
+
+        /* do we need to allow a force-unlock if there's a normal unlock
+           already in progress?  in what conditions could the normal unlock
+           fail such that we'd want to send a force-unlock to be sure? */
+
+        if (args->flags & DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK) {
+                if (lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK)
+                        goto out;
+
+                if (is_overlap_unlock(lkb))
+                        goto out;
 
+                if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_RESEND) {
+                        lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+                        rv = -EBUSY;
+                        goto out;
+                }
+
+                switch (lkb->lkb_wait_type) {
+                case DLM_MSG_LOOKUP:
+                case DLM_MSG_REQUEST:
+                        lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+                        rv = -EBUSY;
+                        goto out;
+                case DLM_MSG_UNLOCK:
+                        goto out;
+                }
+                /* add_to_waiters() will set OVERLAP_UNLOCK */
+                goto out_ok;
+        }
+
+        /* normal unlock not allowed if there's any op in progress */
         rv = -EBUSY;
-        if (lkb->lkb_wait_type)
+        if (lkb->lkb_wait_type || lkb->lkb_wait_count)
                 goto out;
 
  out_ok:
-        lkb->lkb_exflags = args->flags;
+        /* an overlapping op shouldn't blow away exflags from other op */
+        lkb->lkb_exflags |= args->flags;
         lkb->lkb_sbflags = 0;
         lkb->lkb_astparam = args->astparam;
-
         rv = 0;
  out:
+        if (rv)
+                log_debug(ls, "validate_unlock_args %d %x %x %x %x %d %s", rv,
+                          lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_flags, lkb->lkb_exflags,
+                          args->flags, lkb->lkb_wait_type,
+                          lkb->lkb_resource->res_name);
         return rv;
 }
 
@@ -1759,17 +1991,19 @@ static int do_unlock(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
         return -DLM_EUNLOCK;
 }
 
-/* FIXME: if revert_lock() finds that the lkb is granted, we should
-   skip the queue_cast(ECANCEL).  It indicates that the request/convert
-   completed (and queued a normal ast) just before the cancel; we don't
-   want to clobber the sb_result for the normal ast with ECANCEL. */
+/* returns: 0 did nothing, -DLM_ECANCEL canceled lock */
  
 static int do_cancel(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
 {
-        revert_lock(r, lkb);
-        queue_cast(r, lkb, -DLM_ECANCEL);
-        grant_pending_locks(r);
-        return -DLM_ECANCEL;
+        int error;
+
+        error = revert_lock(r, lkb);
+        if (error) {
+                queue_cast(r, lkb, -DLM_ECANCEL);
+                grant_pending_locks(r);
+                return -DLM_ECANCEL;
+        }
+        return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2035,6 +2269,8 @@ int dlm_unlock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace,
 
         if (error == -DLM_EUNLOCK || error == -DLM_ECANCEL)
                 error = 0;
+        if (error == -EBUSY && (flags & (DLM_LKF_CANCEL | DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK)))
+                error = 0;
  out_put:
         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
  out:
@@ -2176,7 +2412,9 @@ static int send_common(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
         struct dlm_mhandle *mh;
         int to_nodeid, error;
 
-        add_to_waiters(lkb, mstype);
+        error = add_to_waiters(lkb, mstype);
+        if (error)
+                return error;
 
         to_nodeid = r->res_nodeid;
 
@@ -2192,7 +2430,7 @@ static int send_common(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
         return 0;
 
  fail:
-        remove_from_waiters(lkb);
+        remove_from_waiters(lkb, msg_reply_type(mstype));
         return error;
 }
 
@@ -2209,7 +2447,8 @@ static int send_convert(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
 
         /* down conversions go without a reply from the master */
         if (!error && down_conversion(lkb)) {
-                remove_from_waiters(lkb);
+                remove_from_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_CONVERT_REPLY);
+                r->res_ls->ls_stub_ms.m_type = DLM_MSG_CONVERT_REPLY;
                 r->res_ls->ls_stub_ms.m_result = 0;
                 r->res_ls->ls_stub_ms.m_flags = lkb->lkb_flags;
                 __receive_convert_reply(r, lkb, &r->res_ls->ls_stub_ms);
@@ -2280,7 +2519,9 @@ static int send_lookup(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
         struct dlm_mhandle *mh;
         int to_nodeid, error;
 
-        add_to_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP);
+        error = add_to_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP);
+        if (error)
+                return error;
 
         to_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(r);
 
@@ -2296,7 +2537,7 @@ static int send_lookup(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
         return 0;
 
  fail:
-        remove_from_waiters(lkb);
+        remove_from_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP_REPLY);
         return error;
 }
 
@@ -2740,7 +2981,7 @@ static void receive_request_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
 {
         struct dlm_lkb *lkb;
         struct dlm_rsb *r;
-        int error, mstype;
+        int error, mstype, result;
 
         error = find_lkb(ls, ms->m_remid, &lkb);
         if (error) {
@@ -2749,20 +2990,15 @@ static void receive_request_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
         }
         DLM_ASSERT(is_process_copy(lkb), dlm_print_lkb(lkb););
 
-        mstype = lkb->lkb_wait_type;
-        error = remove_from_waiters(lkb);
-        if (error) {
-                log_error(ls, "receive_request_reply not on waiters");
-                goto out;
-        }
-
-        /* this is the value returned from do_request() on the master */
-        error = ms->m_result;
-
         r = lkb->lkb_resource;
         hold_rsb(r);
         lock_rsb(r);
 
+        mstype = lkb->lkb_wait_type;
+        error = remove_from_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_REQUEST_REPLY);
+        if (error)
+                goto out;
+
         /* Optimization: the dir node was also the master, so it took our
            lookup as a request and sent request reply instead of lookup reply */
         if (mstype == DLM_MSG_LOOKUP) {
@@ -2770,14 +3006,15 @@ static void receive_request_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
                 lkb->lkb_nodeid = r->res_nodeid;
         }
 
-        switch (error) {
+        /* this is the value returned from do_request() on the master */
+        result = ms->m_result;
+
+        switch (result) {
         case -EAGAIN:
-                /* request would block (be queued) on remote master;
-                   the unhold undoes the original ref from create_lkb()
-                   so it leads to the lkb being freed */
+                /* request would block (be queued) on remote master */
                 queue_cast(r, lkb, -EAGAIN);
                 confirm_master(r, -EAGAIN);
-                unhold_lkb(lkb);
+                unhold_lkb(lkb); /* undoes create_lkb() */
                 break;
 
         case -EINPROGRESS:
@@ -2785,41 +3022,62 @@ static void receive_request_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
                 /* request was queued or granted on remote master */
                 receive_flags_reply(lkb, ms);
                 lkb->lkb_remid = ms->m_lkid;
-                if (error)
+                if (result)
                         add_lkb(r, lkb, DLM_LKSTS_WAITING);
                 else {
                         grant_lock_pc(r, lkb, ms);
                         queue_cast(r, lkb, 0);
                 }
-                confirm_master(r, error);
+                confirm_master(r, result);
                 break;
 
         case -EBADR:
         case -ENOTBLK:
                 /* find_rsb failed to find rsb or rsb wasn't master */
+                log_debug(ls, "receive_request_reply %x %x master diff %d %d",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_flags, r->res_nodeid, result);
                 r->res_nodeid = -1;
                 lkb->lkb_nodeid = -1;
-                _request_lock(r, lkb);
+
+                if (is_overlap(lkb)) {
+                        /* we'll ignore error in cancel/unlock reply */
+                        queue_cast_overlap(r, lkb);
+                        unhold_lkb(lkb); /* undoes create_lkb() */
+                } else
+                        _request_lock(r, lkb);
                 break;
 
         default:
-                log_error(ls, "receive_request_reply error %d", error);
+                log_error(ls, "receive_request_reply %x error %d",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, result);
         }
 
+        if (is_overlap_unlock(lkb) && (result == 0 || result == -EINPROGRESS)) {
+                log_debug(ls, "receive_request_reply %x result %d unlock",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, result);
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+                send_unlock(r, lkb);
+        } else if (is_overlap_cancel(lkb) && (result == -EINPROGRESS)) {
+                log_debug(ls, "receive_request_reply %x cancel", lkb->lkb_id);
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+                send_cancel(r, lkb);
+        } else {
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+        }
+ out:
         unlock_rsb(r);
         put_rsb(r);
- out:
         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
 }
 
 static void __receive_convert_reply(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
                                     struct dlm_message *ms)
 {
-        int error = ms->m_result;
-
         /* this is the value returned from do_convert() on the master */
-
-        switch (error) {
+        switch (ms->m_result) {
         case -EAGAIN:
                 /* convert would block (be queued) on remote master */
                 queue_cast(r, lkb, -EAGAIN);
@@ -2839,19 +3097,26 @@ static void __receive_convert_reply(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
                 break;
 
         default:
-                log_error(r->res_ls, "receive_convert_reply error %d", error);
+                log_error(r->res_ls, "receive_convert_reply %x error %d",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, ms->m_result);
         }
 }
 
 static void _receive_convert_reply(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_message *ms)
 {
         struct dlm_rsb *r = lkb->lkb_resource;
+        int error;
 
         hold_rsb(r);
         lock_rsb(r);
 
-        __receive_convert_reply(r, lkb, ms);
+        /* stub reply can happen with waiters_mutex held */
+        error = remove_from_waiters_ms(lkb, ms);
+        if (error)
+                goto out;
 
+        __receive_convert_reply(r, lkb, ms);
+ out:
         unlock_rsb(r);
         put_rsb(r);
 }
@@ -2868,37 +3133,38 @@ static void receive_convert_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
         }
         DLM_ASSERT(is_process_copy(lkb), dlm_print_lkb(lkb););
 
-        error = remove_from_waiters(lkb);
-        if (error) {
-                log_error(ls, "receive_convert_reply not on waiters");
-                goto out;
-        }
-
         _receive_convert_reply(lkb, ms);
- out:
         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
 }
 
 static void _receive_unlock_reply(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_message *ms)
 {
         struct dlm_rsb *r = lkb->lkb_resource;
-        int error = ms->m_result;
+        int error;
 
         hold_rsb(r);
         lock_rsb(r);
 
+        /* stub reply can happen with waiters_mutex held */
+        error = remove_from_waiters_ms(lkb, ms);
+        if (error)
+                goto out;
+
         /* this is the value returned from do_unlock() on the master */
 
-        switch (error) {
+        switch (ms->m_result) {
         case -DLM_EUNLOCK:
                 receive_flags_reply(lkb, ms);
                 remove_lock_pc(r, lkb);
                 queue_cast(r, lkb, -DLM_EUNLOCK);
                 break;
+        case -ENOENT:
+                break;
         default:
-                log_error(r->res_ls, "receive_unlock_reply error %d", error);
+                log_error(r->res_ls, "receive_unlock_reply %x error %d",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, ms->m_result);
         }
-
+ out:
         unlock_rsb(r);
         put_rsb(r);
 }
@@ -2915,37 +3181,39 @@ static void receive_unlock_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
         }
         DLM_ASSERT(is_process_copy(lkb), dlm_print_lkb(lkb););
 
-        error = remove_from_waiters(lkb);
-        if (error) {
-                log_error(ls, "receive_unlock_reply not on waiters");
-                goto out;
-        }
-
         _receive_unlock_reply(lkb, ms);
- out:
         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
 }
 
 static void _receive_cancel_reply(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_message *ms)
 {
         struct dlm_rsb *r = lkb->lkb_resource;
-        int error = ms->m_result;
+        int error;
 
         hold_rsb(r);
         lock_rsb(r);
 
+        /* stub reply can happen with waiters_mutex held */
+        error = remove_from_waiters_ms(lkb, ms);
+        if (error)
+                goto out;
+
         /* this is the value returned from do_cancel() on the master */
 
-        switch (error) {
+        switch (ms->m_result) {
         case -DLM_ECANCEL:
                 receive_flags_reply(lkb, ms);
                 revert_lock_pc(r, lkb);
-                queue_cast(r, lkb, -DLM_ECANCEL);
+                if (ms->m_result)
+                        queue_cast(r, lkb, -DLM_ECANCEL);
+                break;
+        case 0:
                 break;
         default:
-                log_error(r->res_ls, "receive_cancel_reply error %d", error);
+                log_error(r->res_ls, "receive_cancel_reply %x error %d",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, ms->m_result);
         }
-
+ out:
         unlock_rsb(r);
         put_rsb(r);
 }
@@ -2962,14 +3230,7 @@ static void receive_cancel_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
         }
         DLM_ASSERT(is_process_copy(lkb), dlm_print_lkb(lkb););
 
-        error = remove_from_waiters(lkb);
-        if (error) {
-                log_error(ls, "receive_cancel_reply not on waiters");
-                goto out;
-        }
-
         _receive_cancel_reply(lkb, ms);
- out:
         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
 }
 
@@ -2985,20 +3246,17 @@ static void receive_lookup_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
                 return;
         }
 
-        error = remove_from_waiters(lkb);
-        if (error) {
-                log_error(ls, "receive_lookup_reply not on waiters");
-                goto out;
-        }
-
-        /* this is the value returned by dlm_dir_lookup on dir node
+        /* ms->m_result is the value returned by dlm_dir_lookup on dir node
            FIXME: will a non-zero error ever be returned? */
-        error = ms->m_result;
 
         r = lkb->lkb_resource;
         hold_rsb(r);
         lock_rsb(r);
 
+        error = remove_from_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP_REPLY);
+        if (error)
+                goto out;
+
         ret_nodeid = ms->m_nodeid;
         if (ret_nodeid == dlm_our_nodeid()) {
                 r->res_nodeid = 0;
@@ -3009,14 +3267,22 @@ static void receive_lookup_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
                 r->res_nodeid = ret_nodeid;
         }
 
+        if (is_overlap(lkb)) {
+                log_debug(ls, "receive_lookup_reply %x unlock %x",
+                          lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_flags);
+                queue_cast_overlap(r, lkb);
+                unhold_lkb(lkb); /* undoes create_lkb() */
+                goto out_list;
+        }
+
         _request_lock(r, lkb);
 
+ out_list:
         if (!ret_nodeid)
                 process_lookup_list(r);
-
+ out:
         unlock_rsb(r);
         put_rsb(r);
- out:
         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
 }
 
@@ -3153,9 +3419,9 @@ static void recover_convert_waiter(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
 {
         if (middle_conversion(lkb)) {
                 hold_lkb(lkb);
+                ls->ls_stub_ms.m_type = DLM_MSG_CONVERT_REPLY;
                 ls->ls_stub_ms.m_result = -EINPROGRESS;
                 ls->ls_stub_ms.m_flags = lkb->lkb_flags;
-                _remove_from_waiters(lkb);
                 _receive_convert_reply(lkb, &ls->ls_stub_ms);
 
                 /* Same special case as in receive_rcom_lock_args() */
@@ -3227,18 +3493,18 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
 
                 case DLM_MSG_UNLOCK:
                         hold_lkb(lkb);
+                        ls->ls_stub_ms.m_type = DLM_MSG_UNLOCK_REPLY;
                         ls->ls_stub_ms.m_result = -DLM_EUNLOCK;
                         ls->ls_stub_ms.m_flags = lkb->lkb_flags;
-                        _remove_from_waiters(lkb);
                         _receive_unlock_reply(lkb, &ls->ls_stub_ms);
                         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
                         break;
 
                 case DLM_MSG_CANCEL:
                         hold_lkb(lkb);
+                        ls->ls_stub_ms.m_type = DLM_MSG_CANCEL_REPLY;
                         ls->ls_stub_ms.m_result = -DLM_ECANCEL;
                         ls->ls_stub_ms.m_flags = lkb->lkb_flags;
-                        _remove_from_waiters(lkb);
                         _receive_cancel_reply(lkb, &ls->ls_stub_ms);
                         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
                         break;
@@ -3252,37 +3518,47 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
         mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
 }
 
-static int remove_resend_waiter(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb **lkb_ret)
+static struct dlm_lkb *find_resend_waiter(struct dlm_ls *ls)
 {
         struct dlm_lkb *lkb;
-        int rv = 0;
+        int found = 0;
 
         mutex_lock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
         list_for_each_entry(lkb, &ls->ls_waiters, lkb_wait_reply) {
                 if (lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_RESEND) {
-                        rv = lkb->lkb_wait_type;
-                        _remove_from_waiters(lkb);
-                        lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_RESEND;
+                        hold_lkb(lkb);
+                        found = 1;
                         break;
                 }
         }
         mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
 
-        if (!rv)
+        if (!found)
                 lkb = NULL;
-        *lkb_ret = lkb;
-        return rv;
+        return lkb;
 }
 
 /* Deal with lookups and lkb's marked RESEND from _pre.  We may now be the
    master or dir-node for r.  Processing the lkb may result in it being placed
    back on waiters. */
 
+/* We do this after normal locking has been enabled and any saved messages
+   (in requestqueue) have been processed.  We should be confident that at
+   this point we won't get or process a reply to any of these waiting
+   operations.  But, new ops may be coming in on the rsbs/locks here from
+   userspace or remotely. */
+
+/* there may have been an overlap unlock/cancel prior to recovery or after
+   recovery.  if before, the lkb may still have a pos wait_count; if after, the
+   overlap flag would just have been set and nothing new sent.  we can be
+   confident here than any replies to either the initial op or overlap ops
+   prior to recovery have been received. */
+
 int dlm_recover_waiters_post(struct dlm_ls *ls)
 {
         struct dlm_lkb *lkb;
         struct dlm_rsb *r;
-        int error = 0, mstype;
+        int error = 0, mstype, err, oc, ou;
 
         while (1) {
                 if (dlm_locking_stopped(ls)) {
@@ -3291,48 +3567,78 @@ int dlm_recover_waiters_post(struct dlm_ls *ls)
                         break;
                 }
 
-                mstype = remove_resend_waiter(ls, &lkb);
-                if (!mstype)
+                lkb = find_resend_waiter(ls);
+                if (!lkb)
                         break;
 
                 r = lkb->lkb_resource;
+                hold_rsb(r);
+                lock_rsb(r);
+
+                mstype = lkb->lkb_wait_type;
+                oc = is_overlap_cancel(lkb);
+                ou = is_overlap_unlock(lkb);
+                err = 0;
 
                 log_debug(ls, "recover_waiters_post %x type %d flags %x %s",
                           lkb->lkb_id, mstype, lkb->lkb_flags, r->res_name);
 
-                switch (mstype) {
-
-                case DLM_MSG_LOOKUP:
-                        hold_rsb(r);
-                        lock_rsb(r);
-                        _request_lock(r, lkb);
-                        if (is_master(r))
-                                confirm_master(r, 0);
-                        unlock_rsb(r);
-                        put_rsb(r);
-                        break;
-
-                case DLM_MSG_REQUEST:
-                        hold_rsb(r);
-                        lock_rsb(r);
-                        _request_lock(r, lkb);
-                        if (is_master(r))
-                                confirm_master(r, 0);
-                        unlock_rsb(r);
-                        put_rsb(r);
-                        break;
-
-                case DLM_MSG_CONVERT:
-                        hold_rsb(r);
-                        lock_rsb(r);
-                        _convert_lock(r, lkb);
-                        unlock_rsb(r);
-                        put_rsb(r);
-                        break;
-
-                default:
-                        log_error(ls, "recover_waiters_post type %d", mstype);
+                /* At this point we assume that we won't get a reply to any
+                   previous op or overlap op on this lock.  First, do a big
+                   remove_from_waiters() for all previous ops. */
+
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_RESEND;
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_UNLOCK;
+                lkb->lkb_flags &= ~DLM_IFL_OVERLAP_CANCEL;
+                lkb->lkb_wait_type = 0;
+                lkb->lkb_wait_count = 0;
+                mutex_lock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
+                list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_wait_reply);
+                mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
+                unhold_lkb(lkb); /* for waiters list */
+
+                if (oc || ou) {
+                        /* do an unlock or cancel instead of resending */
+                        switch (mstype) {
+                        case DLM_MSG_LOOKUP:
+                        case DLM_MSG_REQUEST:
+                                queue_cast(r, lkb, ou ? -DLM_EUNLOCK :
+                                                        -DLM_ECANCEL);
+                                unhold_lkb(lkb); /* undoes create_lkb() */
+                                break;
+                        case DLM_MSG_CONVERT:
+                                if (oc) {
+                                        queue_cast(r, lkb, -DLM_ECANCEL);
+                                } else {
+                                        lkb->lkb_exflags |= DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK;
+                                        _unlock_lock(r, lkb);
+                                }
+                                break;
+                        default:
+                                err = 1;
+                        }
+                } else {
+                        switch (mstype) {
+                        case DLM_MSG_LOOKUP:
+                        case DLM_MSG_REQUEST:
+                                _request_lock(r, lkb);
+                                if (is_master(r))
+                                        confirm_master(r, 0);
+                                break;
+                        case DLM_MSG_CONVERT:
+                                _convert_lock(r, lkb);
+                                break;
+                        default:
+                                err = 1;
+                        }
                 }
+
+                if (err)
+                        log_error(ls, "recover_waiters_post %x %d %x %d %d",
+                                  lkb->lkb_id, mstype, lkb->lkb_flags, oc, ou);
+                unlock_rsb(r);
+                put_rsb(r);
+                dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
         }
 
         return error;
@@ -3684,7 +3990,7 @@ int dlm_user_request(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_args *ua,
 
         /* add this new lkb to the per-process list of locks */
         spin_lock(&ua->proc->locks_spin);
-        kref_get(&lkb->lkb_ref);
+        hold_lkb(lkb);
         list_add_tail(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue, &ua->proc->locks);
         spin_unlock(&ua->proc->locks_spin);
  out:
@@ -3774,6 +4080,9 @@ int dlm_user_unlock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_args *ua_tmp,
 
         if (error == -DLM_EUNLOCK)
                 error = 0;
+        /* from validate_unlock_args() */
+        if (error == -EBUSY && (flags & DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK))
+                error = 0;
         if (error)
                 goto out_put;
 
@@ -3786,6 +4095,7 @@ int dlm_user_unlock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_args *ua_tmp,
         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
  out:
         unlock_recovery(ls);
+        kfree(ua_tmp);
         return error;
 }
 
@@ -3815,33 +4125,37 @@ int dlm_user_cancel(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_args *ua_tmp,
 
         if (error == -DLM_ECANCEL)
                 error = 0;
-        if (error)
-                goto out_put;
-
-        /* this lkb was removed from the WAITING queue */
-        if (lkb->lkb_grmode == DLM_LOCK_IV) {
-                spin_lock(&ua->proc->locks_spin);
-                list_move(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue, &ua->proc->unlocking);
-                spin_unlock(&ua->proc->locks_spin);
-        }
+        /* from validate_unlock_args() */
+        if (error == -EBUSY)
+                error = 0;
  out_put:
         dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
  out:
         unlock_recovery(ls);
+        kfree(ua_tmp);
         return error;
 }
 
+/* lkb's that are removed from the waiters list by revert are just left on the
+   orphans list with the granted orphan locks, to be freed by purge */
+
 static int orphan_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
 {
         struct dlm_user_args *ua = (struct dlm_user_args *)lkb->lkb_astparam;
+        struct dlm_args args;
+        int error;
 
-        if (ua->lksb.sb_lvbptr)
-                kfree(ua->lksb.sb_lvbptr);
-        kfree(ua);
-        lkb->lkb_astparam = (long)NULL;
+        hold_lkb(lkb);
+        mutex_lock(&ls->ls_orphans_mutex);
+        list_add_tail(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue, &ls->ls_orphans);
+        mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_orphans_mutex);
 
-        /* TODO: propogate to master if needed */
-        return 0;
+        set_unlock_args(0, ua, &args);
+
+        error = cancel_lock(ls, lkb, &args);
+        if (error == -DLM_ECANCEL)
+                error = 0;
+        return error;
 }
 
 /* The force flag allows the unlock to go ahead even if the lkb isn't granted.
@@ -3853,10 +4167,6 @@ static int unlock_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
         struct dlm_args args;
         int error;
 
-        /* FIXME: we need to handle the case where the lkb is in limbo
-           while the rsb is being looked up, currently we assert in
-           _unlock_lock/is_remote because rsb nodeid is -1. */
-
         set_unlock_args(DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK, ua, &args);
 
         error = unlock_lock(ls, lkb, &args);
@@ -3865,6 +4175,31 @@ static int unlock_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
         return error;
 }
 
+/* We have to release clear_proc_locks mutex before calling unlock_proc_lock()
+   (which does lock_rsb) due to deadlock with receiving a message that does
+   lock_rsb followed by dlm_user_add_ast() */
+
+static struct dlm_lkb *del_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls,
+                                     struct dlm_user_proc *proc)
+{
+        struct dlm_lkb *lkb = NULL;
+
+        mutex_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+        if (list_empty(&proc->locks))
+                goto out;
+
+        lkb = list_entry(proc->locks.next, struct dlm_lkb, lkb_ownqueue);
+        list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue);
+
+        if (lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_PERSISTENT)
+                lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_ORPHAN;
+        else
+                lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_DEAD;
+ out:
+        mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+        return lkb;
+}
+
 /* The ls_clear_proc_locks mutex protects against dlm_user_add_asts() which
    1) references lkb->ua which we free here and 2) adds lkbs to proc->asts,
    which we clear here. */
@@ -3880,18 +4215,15 @@ void dlm_clear_proc_locks(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_proc *proc)
         struct dlm_lkb *lkb, *safe;
 
         lock_recovery(ls);
-        mutex_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
 
-        list_for_each_entry_safe(lkb, safe, &proc->locks, lkb_ownqueue) {
-                list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue);
-
-                if (lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_PERSISTENT) {
-                        lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_ORPHAN;
+        while (1) {
+                lkb = del_proc_lock(ls, proc);
+                if (!lkb)
+                        break;
+                if (lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_PERSISTENT)
                         orphan_proc_lock(ls, lkb);
-                } else {
-                        lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_DEAD;
+                else
                         unlock_proc_lock(ls, lkb);
-                }
 
                 /* this removes the reference for the proc->locks list
                    added by dlm_user_request, it may result in the lkb
@@ -3900,6 +4232,8 @@ void dlm_clear_proc_locks(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_proc *proc)
                 dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
         }
 
+        mutex_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+
         /* in-progress unlocks */
         list_for_each_entry_safe(lkb, safe, &proc->unlocking, lkb_ownqueue) {
                 list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue);