Btrfs: sectorsize align offsets in fiemap

We've been hitting BUG()'s in btrfs_cont_expand and btrfs_fallocate and anywhere
else that calls btrfs_get_extent while running xfstests 13 in a loop.  This is
because fiemap is calling btrfs_get_extent with non-sectorsize aligned offsets,
which will end up adding mappings that are not sectorsize aligned, which will
cause problems in some cases for subsequent calls to btrfs_get_extent for
similar areas that are sectorsize aligned.  With this patch I ran xfstests 13 in
a loop for a couple of hours and didn't hit the problem that I could previously
hit in at most 20 minutes.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index a877b8b212eb..9472d3de5e52 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3366,6 +3366,9 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
                 return -ENOMEM;
         path->leave_spinning = 1;
 
+        start = ALIGN(start, BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize);
+        len = ALIGN(len, BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize);
+
         /*
          * lookup the last file extent.  We're not using i_size here
          * because there might be preallocation past i_size
@@ -3413,7 +3416,7 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
         lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, start + len, 0,
                          &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
 
-        em = get_extent_skip_holes(inode, off, last_for_get_extent,
+        em = get_extent_skip_holes(inode, start, last_for_get_extent,
                                    get_extent);
         if (!em)
                 goto out;