Btrfs: use i_version instead of our own sequence

We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody
would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which
serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's
sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the
board, and not just in file write.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 53bf2d764bbc..8aa8d7fe74d7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1409,7 +1409,6 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
                 mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
                 goto out;
         }
-        BTRFS_I(inode)->sequence++;
 
         start_pos = round_down(pos, root->sectorsize);
         if (start_pos > i_size_read(inode)) {