Btrfs: cleanup warnings from gcc 4.6 (nonbugs)

These are all the cases where a variable is set, but not read which are
not bugs as far as I can see, but simply leftovers.

Still needs more review.

Found by gcc 4.6's new warnings

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 59c8daaacf0c..df754108b952 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -5719,7 +5719,6 @@ static noinline void reada_walk_down(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
         u64 generation;
         u64 refs;
         u64 flags;
-        u64 last = 0;
         u32 nritems;
         u32 blocksize;
         struct btrfs_key key;
@@ -5787,7 +5786,6 @@ reada:
                                            generation);
                 if (ret)
                         break;
-                last = bytenr + blocksize;
                 nread++;
         }
         wc->reada_slot = slot;