Btrfs: don't set for_cow parameter for tree block functions

Three callers of btrfs_free_tree_block or btrfs_alloc_tree_block passed
parameter for_cow = 1. In fact, these two functions should never mark
their tree modification operations as for_cow, because they can change
the number of blocks referenced by a tree.

Hence, we remove the extra for_cow parameter from these functions and
make them pass a zero down.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index ec42a24e935e..e863188a3f17 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -2496,11 +2496,11 @@ struct extent_buffer *btrfs_alloc_free_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                                         struct btrfs_root *root, u32 blocksize,
                                         u64 parent, u64 root_objectid,
                                         struct btrfs_disk_key *key, int level,
-                                        u64 hint, u64 empty_size, int for_cow);
+                                        u64 hint, u64 empty_size);
 void btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                            struct btrfs_root *root,
                            struct extent_buffer *buf,
-                           u64 parent, int last_ref, int for_cow);
+                           u64 parent, int last_ref);
 struct extent_buffer *btrfs_init_new_buffer(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                                             struct btrfs_root *root,
                                             u64 bytenr, u32 blocksize,