diff options
author | Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> | 2008-02-21 18:11:02 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> | 2008-02-24 00:07:49 -0500 |
commit | de92d84ec2305c490aa1db33f6e40680f8c236a8 (patch) | |
tree | 78298ae28581b04642313f1d78c968d1e53573e5 /drivers | |
parent | 4a5694e66428607585c9f4dd14bcf4158d2de191 (diff) |
e1000e: fix flow control denial of service possibility
this patch avoids a denial of service from an evildoer sending a
continuous stream of flow control at our adapter that is plugged
into a non-flow control enabled switch.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/e1000e/lib.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/lib.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/lib.c index 0860b5fb3471..341d74e81fb0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/lib.c +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/lib.c | |||
@@ -1104,34 +1104,13 @@ s32 e1000e_config_fc_after_link_up(struct e1000_hw *hw) | |||
1104 | (mii_nway_lp_ability_reg & NWAY_LPAR_ASM_DIR)) { | 1104 | (mii_nway_lp_ability_reg & NWAY_LPAR_ASM_DIR)) { |
1105 | mac->fc = e1000_fc_rx_pause; | 1105 | mac->fc = e1000_fc_rx_pause; |
1106 | hw_dbg(hw, "Flow Control = RX PAUSE frames only.\r\n"); | 1106 | hw_dbg(hw, "Flow Control = RX PAUSE frames only.\r\n"); |
1107 | } | 1107 | } else { |
1108 | /* Per the IEEE spec, at this point flow control should be | 1108 | /* |
1109 | * disabled. However, we want to consider that we could | 1109 | * Per the IEEE spec, at this point flow control |
1110 | * be connected to a legacy switch that doesn't advertise | 1110 | * should be disabled. |
1111 | * desired flow control, but can be forced on the link | 1111 | */ |
1112 | * partner. So if we advertised no flow control, that is | ||
1113 | * what we will resolve to. If we advertised some kind of | ||
1114 | * receive capability (Rx Pause Only or Full Flow Control) | ||
1115 | * and the link partner advertised none, we will configure | ||
1116 | * ourselves to enable Rx Flow Control only. We can do | ||
1117 | * this safely for two reasons: If the link partner really | ||
1118 | * didn't want flow control enabled, and we enable Rx, no | ||
1119 | * harm done since we won't be receiving any PAUSE frames | ||
1120 | * anyway. If the intent on the link partner was to have | ||
1121 | * flow control enabled, then by us enabling RX only, we | ||
1122 | * can at least receive pause frames and process them. | ||
1123 | * This is a good idea because in most cases, since we are | ||
1124 | * predominantly a server NIC, more times than not we will | ||
1125 | * be asked to delay transmission of packets than asking | ||
1126 | * our link partner to pause transmission of frames. | ||
1127 | */ | ||
1128 | else if ((mac->original_fc == e1000_fc_none) || | ||
1129 | (mac->original_fc == e1000_fc_tx_pause)) { | ||
1130 | mac->fc = e1000_fc_none; | 1112 | mac->fc = e1000_fc_none; |
1131 | hw_dbg(hw, "Flow Control = NONE.\r\n"); | 1113 | hw_dbg(hw, "Flow Control = NONE.\r\n"); |
1132 | } else { | ||
1133 | mac->fc = e1000_fc_rx_pause; | ||
1134 | hw_dbg(hw, "Flow Control = RX PAUSE frames only.\r\n"); | ||
1135 | } | 1114 | } |
1136 | 1115 | ||
1137 | /* Now we need to do one last check... If we auto- | 1116 | /* Now we need to do one last check... If we auto- |